Watch full size video:
NEW YORK — Bernard Madoff was sent to bridewell Thursday after confessing in court to a multibillion-dollar Ponzi excogitate, besides the intrigue deepened as embittered victims pressed the government to find used up who may have helped him and where the coin went.
After a 75-minute trial at which he pleaded guilty to 11 criminal counts and said he was “deeply sorry and ashamed,” Madoff was led away in handcuffs for a future that will differ vastly from the opulent lifestyle he has led.
“I realized that my arrest and this day would inevitably come,” Madoff told a packed courtroom in his elementary public comments since his scheme was revealed in December. “I am painfully aware that I have hurt many, many people.”
That was little consolation to the more than pair twelve investors who squeezed into the federal courtroom for a glimpse of the man who bilked many out of their life savings in the $65 billion project.
“It’s about time he went to jail,” said victim Mark Labianca. “He should have been in workhouse from the get-go.”
Almost 5,000 investors — including director Steven Spielberg, actor Kevin Bacon and baseball legend Sandy Koufax — were ensnared by means of the smooth-talking financier who boasted of regular returns end treacherous markets.
Investors applauded as U.S. District Judge Denny Chin rejected Madoff’s petition for to continue living at his Manhattan gratification apartment until his scheduled sentencing June 16.
Yet many victims bridled at the lack of information about how he pulled off the elaborate iniquity and whether there’s somewhat cash left to repay them.
“Investors defectiveness some riches in a backward direction. \,” said Sharon Lissauer, a New York imitation who entrusted her life savings to Madoff. “Even if he spends the recline of his animated existence in jail, that doesn’confidentially help me.”
Madoff faces a maximum 150 years in prison, though experts predict his sentence will have existence closer to 20 years, essentially a life term for the 70-year-old.
The hearing made free from hindrance that Madoff is refusing to help the polity build a specific instance in requital for anyone else.
Repeatedly, Madoff insisted the stock-trading business run by his brother and two sons was entirely legalize and untainted by his crime. That contradicted the criminal charges against him and statements made in court by the agency of Marc Litt, the treaty prosecutor handling the case, who reported that at times Madoff’s company “would have been unable to operate without the standard of value from this scheme.”
Madoff also claimed his imposture began in the early 1990s, not in the 1980s, as the commonwealth contends, an assertion that seemed to be aimed at limiting how far back into the family vocation history the government can reach for restitution.
No relatives have been accused of wrongdoing and all — Madoff’s wife, Ruth, his brother Peter and his sons, Mark and Andrew — have denied knowledge of the fraud.
When one of Madoff’s victims urged a public trial to shed more light on the crime, Litt promised the government was vigorously investigating what happened to the money and who else was involved, questions that could have been answered by Madoff, then and in that place, if he were willing.
“Did we get answers? Not at aggregate,” said George Nierenberg, an award-winning filmmaker whose family lost almost everything to Madoff. Nierenberg was one of a handful of victims Chin allowed to speak at the hearing.
The inconsistencies between Madoff’s version and the government’sitting charges are evidence no plea agreement could be reached, said Joel Cohen, a partner at Clifford Chance and a former federal prosecutor in Brooklyn.
“Clearly, he’s light-years away from being cooperative,” Cohen said after reviewing a transcript of the hearing. “Essentially, Madoff is saying, ‘I’ll plead guilty — if it were not that I’m not going to plead guilty to exactly that which you say I did.’ “
After the hearing, Lev Dassin, acting U.S. advocate in Manhattan, said, “While we do not agree with all the assertions made by means of Mr. Madoff today, these admissions certainly settle his guilt. We are continuing to investigate the fraud and will bring additional charges … as warranted.”
After Madoff’s plea was accepted, his lawyer, Ira Lee Sorkin, tried to persuade Chin to remit Madoff to remain free onward bail until he is sentenced.
Chin refused. “He has incentive to decamp, he has the substance to flee, and thus he presents the risk of flight,” Chin reported. “Bail is revoked.”
Sorkin said he devise appeal the handle abjuration.
Madoff’s fraud became a global scheme that ensnared hedge funds, nonprofit groups and celebrities, and destroyed many life savings. He enticed thousands of investors, including Sen. Frank Lautenberg of New Jersey and a charity run by the Nobel Peace Prize laureate Elie Wiesel.
The fraud’s collapse erased up to $65 billion that his customers thought they had. It remains unclear where that circulating medium went, and whether those victims power of determination look to some meaningful restitution.
A court-appointed trustee liquidating Madoff’s business has in the same manner far only been proficient to identify about $1 billion in property to satisfy claims.