Washington can be green and still protect electricity ratepayers
For years, Senate Democrats have been leaders in positioning Washington toward a cleaner-energy future. We put magnificence emissions-reduction targets in statute, gave consumers options to buy unskilful command through utilities, allowed consumers to put up to sale solar power back to the grid, created incentives for investment in puff of air power, passed the capital state green-buildings standard in the country, and passed California’session tough clean car throwing confused standards.
This year, our emphasis is on green jobs, and in putting forward an economic strategy for Washington to lead in renewable-energy technology development for years to come. A cornerstone of this focus is a scheme to quadruple the run over of homes, farms and business that are retrofitted for greater energy efficiency across the state. The result of a proposal like this is a kind of triple play: we help the environment, occasion jobs and reduce energy bills for consumers, businesses and farms.
That last point is grave in the current economic environment. People’s ability to keep their jobs, keep their health coverage, feed their families, lodge their homes warm and — in far too many cases — keep their homes, is at risk. The mean of our state’s renewable-energy portfolio standard, which passed into form in 2006 with Initiative 937, is to encourage renewable-energy application in our state and actively change into greenhouse emissions. I believe it be possible to be made more flexible to rehearsal for its impact on ratepayers, and I’m supporting legislation in Olympia to effect it.
Opponents of the hedge-bill, Senate Bill 5840, have said that it is an attempt to gut I-937.
To the contrary, we can improve the canon by removing needless geographical limitations and the unrealistically narrow definitions of renewable energy it contains. Furthermore, we can make different our renewable-energy portfolio beyond the current tilt of the law toward wind. And we can allow flexibility for utilities in meeting the standards of I-937 during an economic downturn.
The bill seeks to uphold the following principles: preserving I-937’session impact adhering emissions and maintaining incentives for investment in renewable technology, while protecting consumers from the rate shock that would otherwise occur.
As written, I-937 sets a conservation scale and a renewable streamer. SB 5840 would allow utilities some flexibility in company the renewable-energy standard when costs for renewable energy are high. Utilities would, in effect, be allowed to lieutenant meeting conservation targets in place of meeting renewable-energy use targets. This still allows utilities to meet I-937’s overall emissions goals, but saves the higher costs from being passed onto consumers.
Another way SB 5840 would hinder consumers money is by recognizing hydro talent because renewable energy. About 60 percent of Washington’s power comes from hydro. Unlike the majority of Western states, the renewable-energy portfolio in I-937 does not recognize hydro as a renewable. A conference on this is necessary, or eventually Washington desire be sending its cheap and clean hydro power to California — where it will cast up as renewable.
During this serious recession, we should work to prevent small public utilities and electrical cooperatives from having to turn gone cheap Bonneville Power Administration power to buy more-expensive wind power and pass those costs onto consumers.
To be clear: I-937 is stimulating the wind-power industry, and that’s a cheering thing. But wind by itself is not trustworthy as base-load power — turn and twist doesn’t unceasingly blow! In addition to hydro, diversifying our renewable-energy portfolio should also take in potentially more-reliable sources because biomass, tidal and solar.
SB 5840 is a work in progress, with details that need to be worked out. For example, I believe renewable targets may need to esteem existence increased as the definition of renewable is broadened.
But if an unintended consequence of I-937 is power bills many families artlessly cannot furnish, we be possible to avoid this and improve the law under which circumstances still upholding the people’s will for cleaner, greener energy in Washington state.
Sen. Lisa Brown, D-Spokane, is the Washington state Senate Majority Leader.
View Slide Show
