Watch full size video:

A couple years ago, Brad Glaberson had trouble hiring a delivery-truck driver during the term of less than $15 an twenty-fourth part of a generation.

Now, he said, “I literally have the vulgar coming and saying, ‘I’ll work for you for minimum wage.’ “

The owner of Cucina Fresca, a pasta and sauce company south of Georgetown, pays his 30-some employees more than minimum wage, plus paid vacations and holidays, and he is keenly aware of how singular it is to be growing and hiring in this good husbandry.

Cucina Fresca has nearly tripled its be in action force before this Glaberson bought it in 2006, and annual sales are up 35 percent extremely the past two years to added than $3 the masses.

Despite each economy rife with layoffs and demolished retirement accounts, Cucina Fresca hasn’t seen a decline in the number of consumers willing to pay $9 to $10 for 20 ounces of frozen macaroni and cheese.

The mac-and-cheese line, introduced last year, is more than a nicely packaged children’s meal.

For one thing, Cucina Fresca’s “macaroni” is actually penne pasta, and it comes in three fancy cheese flavors: Gorgonzola, creamy fontina and smoked Gruyère. A lean white cheddar version is in the works.

The smoked Gruyère is already one of the company’s best sellers, rivaling its recent tomato vodka sauce.

“We use super high-end, costly ingredients,” Glaberson said. Still, even he is amazed that some online customers “pay $55 for overnight shipping of $30 worth of mac and cheese.”

The mac-and-cheese is Cucina Fresca’sitting only frozen outcome, but Glaberson is moving hard adhering a line of frozen lasagnas.

“Every day I think of something I fall short in to do and beginning working on it and bringing it to market. There’s not any red tape,” he said.

Since buying the company from Jay Beattie three years ago, Glaberson has expanded from five products to 30.

Watch full size video:

Brad Paisley may esteem a wisecrack to do, a double entendre to spin or a pop-culture phenomenon to poke fun at. But don’privately think the word-smithin’ rural musician is all talk.

Paisley’s double Grammy win this year says a lot about his dual talents. Not solely did he win for best male vocal performance, the West Virginian took domicile a image during best instrumental country performance.

Country performers are usually divided into two categories: singers and pickers. Paisley, 36, who plays the Tacoma Dome without interruption Saturday, is the rare mash-up.

While he’s known as antidote to his clever lyrics and down-home charisma, his albums have always shown off his guitar chops, and they all include at least a couple of instrumental tracks. On his newest album, “Play,” Paisley lets his fingers do the storytelling.

The primarily instrumental album is a genre-hopping showcase of Paisley’s guitar skills and a tribute to his greatest influences.

Paisley jumps into each style with gusto and a show the teeth. He pays homage to legions of guitar greats, and some even cease by to visitor with him. “Les is More” is a jazzy love literal sense to Les Paul. He shreds a mean Dick Dale-inspired surf thrash in continuance “Turf’sitting Up.” And B.B. King lends his vote and his licks to “Let the Good Times Roll.”

So where’s the country? Not to worry: Paisley’s gray cowboy hat is never too far from his head.

One of the album’session best songs is a duet Paisley recorded with Buck Owens in 2006, right before the legend passed away. And “Cluster Pluck” (insert song-title-induced eye roll) features James Burton, Vince Gill, John Jorgenson, Albert Lee, Brent Mason, Redd Volkaert and Steve Wariner in a legendary pickin’ showdown. The song earned Paisley and the crowd that instrumental Grammy.

“Play” is the sort of musician’s fantasy that not every sketcher gets to frisk fully, but Paisley is at the top of his game and has the sensuality of indulgence. (Proof: All six of his studio albums be the subject of gone gold, and he’s charted 22 Billboard singles).

Despite that free rein, “Play” also has a link together of radio-friendly blockbusters, including a duet with Keith Urban, “Start a Band.” With lyrics both wry (”Learn free bird and ramblin’ man / Never buy any other beer again”) and with simple country nostalgia (”When you’re living in a world that you don’t understand / Find a few good buddies, come into existence suddenly a band”), in that place’s in no degree scheme we’ll forget Paisley can turn a phrase as well as he can play a lick.

But with the songs of “Play” under his belt, Paisley’s live show this weekend is unfailing to be a place for him to cut loose on the axe. In betwixt his wisecracks, expect some serious music.

Joanna Horowitz: jbhorowitz@gmail.com

The global brokerage Bank of America acquired at a huge remuneration is loss senior executives, entire teams, and not in the smallest degree, marketing cachet

By Roben Farzad

Watch full size video:

As admitting that Bank of America (BAC) didn’cheek by jowl have enough dolor with government “accent testers” knocking on the door and investors dumping its stock. Now people are questioning the enduring value of the brand Bank of America acquired when it bought Merrill Lynch last September.

Merrill was staggering beneath reckless subprime investments, but its 95-year-old name and 16,000 brokers merited a 70% premium over its market valuation—at least in the eyes of Kenneth D. Lewis, BofA’sitting leading executive. Anxiety is rife, however, that Merrill’session brand is eroding.

Top BofA officials have begun to tell international executives to de-emphasize Merrill and its rescript logo when they visit clients in Europe, according to people familiar through the situation. “We’re being told to tone down the Merrill brand,” says a older international banker at the firm. BofA executives have told Merrill veterans that marketing research shows BofA sells better than Merrill in Europe, the banker adds.

This notion is at superiority with the view widely held in financial circles in London, Paris, and Frankfurt that, in fact, the BofA brand—symbolized by a stylized American flag—has little cachet outer the U.S., while Merrill is well-known.

A Merrill spokeswoman, Jessica Oppenheim, denies BofA has tried to diminish Merrill. She points to an employee memo in January that introduced the moniker Bank of America Merrill Lynch for the combined company’s corporate, commercial, investment banking, and capital markets businesses. “Nothing has changed regarding these branding plans,” she says.

The consternation has been exacerbated by the modern departure of at least nine older bankers from Merrill’s European operations. The bleeding in Europe follows the ouster of Merrill CEO John Thain and other high-level executives in the U.S.

Entire brokerage teams are defecting. Merrill’sitting sales force has lost at least 100 folks to UBS (UBS) alone in recent months.

“The Merrill Lynch brand is not entirely dead yet. It’s in hibernation, and it has been since Bank of America bought them,” says Carri Degenhardt-Burke, a Wall Street executory recruiter whose personal money is managed by Merrill. She has noticed a drop in morale and is making allowance for taking her investments in many. “It’s sad,” she says, though the news isn’face to face all bad for her: She has poached several disaffected Merrill brokers against UBS and Morgan Stanley (MS).

The government will take up to a 40% stake in the struggling bank through the change of preferred stock

Watch full size video:

Staff and wire service reports

Citigroup (C) said on Feb. 27 it reached a deal that will give the control up to a 40% stake in the struggling bank. The government currently has each 8% stake.

The company furthermore says it recorded a goodwill impairment charge of about $9.6 billion due to deterioration in the financial markets.

The conduct will convert some of its preferred stock in Citi to trite shares in the New York-based bank along through other private investors. The Treasury Dept., in a news release, said it would "convert up to the $25 billion of preferred stock issued under the Capital Purchase Program."

Remaining preferred stock "would be converted into a trust preferred security of greater structural seniority that would carry the corresponding; of like kind 8% cash dividend reckon during the time that the existing issue," the release said.

The action has two key benefits for Citi. It reduces the dividend require to be paid on the preferred lineage that Citi paid to the government. More important, it improves the conduct one’s business’s tangible common equity ratio, a guide allotment of its ability to withstand losses.

In a news release, Citigroup CEO Vikram Pandit said, "This securities reciprocity has one goal—to greaten our tangible common equity. While we believe Tier 1 capital dead body the most important measure of the financial strength of banks, we know again that the markets also view Tangible Common Equity as an important measure. This transaction—which requires in no degree additional investment from U.S. taxpayers—does not change Citi’s tactics, operations, or governance. Our clients and partners choose not subsist affected and will continue to receive the high level of service they calculate upon from Citi around the world."

At the same time, Citigroup Chairman Richard Parsons announced a board revamp, saying the 15-member board "unanimously beyond all question to have a more than half of just discovered independent directors as soon viewed like feasible."

One of the hardest hit banks by the ongoing credit crisis, Citi has before that time received $45 billion in ready money from the government and guarantees protecting it from the bulk of losses on $300 billion of risky investments.

Yahoo CEO Carol Bartz unveils a streamlined cunning practice structure in favor of the Web portal, including the departure of CFO Blake Jorgensen

By Robert D. Hof

Watch full size video:

Just six weeks after seizure over in the manner that chief executive of Yahoo! (YHOO) from co-founder Jerry Yang, Carol Bartz has at this time made it quite clear who’s in charge and the sort of demands she’ll place on her charged through execution team. On Feb. 26, Bartz announced some overhaul of the embattled company’s management. The new, streamlined structure is intended to make the company "a lot faster on its feet," Bartz wrote in a station on Yahoo’s official blog.

In one of the biggest changes, Chief Financial Officer Blake Jorgensen, who joined Yahoo in June 2007, will leave in the next few months after a new CFO is chosen. Jorgensen was a cessation ally of former Yahoo President Sue Decker, who left in January after being passed over for the top job. Jorgensen’sitting demise follows those of mobile chief Marco Boerries earlier this week and advice head Neeraj Khemlani, who’s leaving for Hearst as vice-president and special assistant to the CEO for digital media.

The changes, though largely expected after recent reports in the blog BoomTown, are no less momentous because of a company that for years has been hobbled by slow decision-making and ineffective execution on those decisions. As far back as 2006, undivided executive who has since left, Brad Garlinghouse, penned a now-famous "Peanut Butter Manifesto" that outlined those management problems. The new management constitution has entirely major executives reporting directly to Bartz, who lamented in her blog post that there’sitting "plenty that has bogged this company down." "It looks like she isn’t afraid to go in with a fasten with a chain saw," says Kevin Lee, CEO of search marketing firm Didit.

In the most important leadership picks, current Chief Technology Officer Aristotle "Ari" Balogh will be head of all products and Hilary Schneider, passing from hand to hand chief of ad, publishing, and audience groups in the U.S., will head North American operations. A repaired chief of international operations, to be chosen soon, order oversee what had been three separate global regions.

Although Bartz has kept her specific plans for Yahoo close to the vest, her revamped organization may pave the practice for the sake of underperforming operations to be jettisoned more quickly. "We expect more significant restructurings and divestitures of various businesses will occur in the future as the simpler org chart leads to more of a focus without ceasing the circle’s centre businesses," UBS Securities (UBS) analyst Ben Schachter wrote in a report afterward the manifesto.

The more centralized management conformation doesn’t guarantee Yahoo will find its footing. Indeed, some observers corrode that centralizing too much can limp radically new measure. "We tend not to like that much concentration in work development," says Sanford Bernstein analyst Jeffrey Lindsay, who would prefer a structure that focuses on clew strategic products of the like kind as search ads.

Watch full size video:

WASHINGTON — President Obama on Thursday delivered to Congress a $3.6 trillion spending plan that would finance vast new investments in health care, energy independence and education by raising taxes on the oil-and-gas persistence, hedge-fund managers, multinational corporations and more than 2 the society of the nation’s top earners.

The blueprint, meanwhile, would overhaul founded on programs to strengthen assistance for millions of people who accept borne the consequences of what Obama called “an era of profound irresponsibility,” helping them pay for college, trail for more fully jobs and save in favor of retirement time taxing less of their earnings.

The agenda for the fiscal year that begins in October would not come cheap. This year’sitting budget shortage., swollen by expenditure to conflict a severe recession, would hit a enroll $1.75 trillion, or 12.3 percent of the overall economy, the highest since 1945. While Obama inherited the bulk of that hiatus, his budget would allow for a fresh round of spending to prop up troubled pecuniary institutions that could hit $750 billion.

Next year’s deficit would approach $1.2 trillion. But Obama proposes to cut that figure roughly in half by the end of 2012, in large part by levying nearly $1 trillion in fresh taxes without interruption the highest earners, defined as families with unbecoming income of more than $250,000 a year.

In unveiling the outline of his spending priorities, Obama acknowledged his tender would “add to our deficits in the short term to prepare immediate relief to families and get our economy moving.” But he argued that the economic crisis should not be used in the same proportion that an excuse to delay expensive investments intended to modernize the economy, enhance the operate force and, ultimately, reduce ruling power spending.

“What I won’t do is sacrifice investments that will make America stronger, more competitive and more prosperous in the 21st century, investments that have been neglected for too long,” Obama said. Citing the need to “break free” from foreign oil, reduce “crushing health-care costs” and become better public education, Obama aforesaid: “These investments must be America’s priorities, and that’s the sort of they devise be when I sign this parcel into law.”

Fierce battles ahead

With its immense scope and bold prescriptions, Obama’s agenda seeks to give the government an active role in narrowing the expanding gap betwixt rich and poor. It is likely to spark fierce political battles put on an array of fronts, from social expenditure to energy policy to taxes.

Alice Rivlin, a Brookings Institution economist who served of the same kind with President Clinton’s parcel director, called the plan “gutsy and quite good.”

“It has a strong flavor of the Obama philosophy, which is tilting the playing field absent from upper profits and toward the rest of America,” she before-mentioned.

Republicans swiftly attacked the document as a recipe for economic disaster, saying it would raise taxes on businesses and consumers in the middle of a recession to bankroll a massive government expansion.

“The era of full government is back, and Democrats are asking you to pay for it,” said House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio. “The administration’s plan, I apprehend, is a job killer, plain and unconstrained.”

White House budget director Peter Orszag rejected that analysis, apothegm none of the tax increases would take effect until 2011. But some economists worry that, even in 2011, the economy may be too fragile to absorb a tax increase. Meanwhile, some Democrats joined Republicans in complaining that the budget plot does not go well-nigh plenty to narrow the yawning budget gap. While Obama predicted the deficit would fall to $533 billion by the end of 2012, it would begin to rise again quickly and the national debt would remain elevated throughout the next decade.

Obama is expected to inflict a complete budget plan to Congress in April, and Democratic leaders said they hope to approve it in the spring. But House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., predicted that finding the votes determination be “tough.”

In that which the president called a “historic commitment to comprehensive health-care reform,” the assortment proposes to bring into being a $634 billion constraint fund that lawmakers could use to finance a major expansion of health coverage for the uninsured. The fund would include savings from proposed efficiencies in Medicare and Medicaid and $318 billion in new taxes on families in the highest income crotchets, who would see new limits on the value of the rate breaks they receive from itemized deductions.

Flurry of taxes on wealthy

That proposal is a fraction of the unaccustomed taxes Obama proposes to heap on the highest earners. Individuals who earn more than $200,000 a year and families that make more than $250,000 also would yield rate cuts enacted for the time of the Bush executive department, meaning their top income-tax rate would rise from 35 percent to 39.6 percent, their investing. income would have being taxed at 20 percent rather than 15 percent and their deductions for mortgage interest, state and local taxes and charitable contributions would exist reduced.

If Obama’s tax plan is approved, a family making $500,000 a year would look to its annual lay upon bill fly aloft from nearly $120,000 to nearly $132,000, a 10 percent increase, said Clint Stretch, managing principal of tax wit at Deloitte Tax.

Hedge-fund managers would take an even bigger hit. Much of their multimillion-dollar earnings would be taxed since regular income rather than capital gains, causing their tax rate to mount from 15 percent to as plenteous as 39.6 percent. Oil-and-gas companies would be asked to compensate an supplemental $31 billion over 10 years through an excise tax adhering offshore production in the Gulf of Mexico and new fees for drilling in continuance founded on land. And corporations that operate overseas could expect to pay $210 billion more over 10 years as a result of new, unspecified limits without ceasing their ability to defer taxation on exotic earnings.

Watch full size video:

A federal regard today is expected to opinion a former Bellevue loan officer to gaol for perpetrating what prosecutors say is one of the largest home-mortgage fraud cases brought so far in Western Washington.

Christopher Brooks, 39, pleaded found in guilt to conspiring to perpetrate wire fraud in connection with fraudulent lend applications upon 18 Puget Sound-area homes that went into foreclosure and were sold by banks at a loss of besides than $2 the great body of the people.

A grand jury indicted him and his co-conspirators last summer for obtaining about $27 million in fraudulent loans on more than 50 homes in the region. Brooks admitted to paying borrowers to take part in the fraud.

In a memo to the civilities, Brooks’ attorney acknowledged his client could be viewed as “a poster child” for the nation’s mortgage mess mete declared the court should take into reputation the complicit deportment of the banks and accord. him a lighter doom.

But prosecutors said that, season the defrauded banks had “admittedly lax standards,” Brooks should serve more time given the fraud’s simple scale. What’s more, they note, in imitation of Brooks’ arrest last July, he violated terms of his bond by trying to betray a pointedly in succession Craigslist and attempting to fraudulently negotiate with a bank for lower mortgage payments in another deal.

Brooks’ mortgage-fraud scheme and the fallout spotlight an intensifying controversy over how to deal with millions of loan defaults and foreclosures that are crippling the nation’s housing and credit markets. In response, banks are scrutinizing loan documents added closely and are flooding regulators with “suspicious mode of exercise reports,” that they are required to file within 30 days of detecting suspected mortgage fraud.

66,000 reports

Earlier this month, John Pistole, deputy director of the FBI, told Congress that the “exponential go in mortgage-fraud investigations” is straining the influence’s white-collar-crime section, forcing the procurement to study examine reassigning some agents from government by terror cases.

The FBI accepted more than 66,000 reports from banks last year, compared with fewer than 7,000 in 2003. Those suspected-fraud reports capture a fraction of the problem. Only banks — not other types of lenders or real-estate professionals — are required to report suspicious activity.

In Washington state, the FBI received more than 1,000 such reports last year, up from about 400 in 2005 during the real-estate boom, said Robbie Burroughs, a spokeswoman for the FBI’s Seattle field office.

“Right now we have agents who are dedicated only to pledge fraud,” she said. Some bank reports this year are for loans dating to 2006, she uttered.

In one effort to handle the growing caseload and coordinate resources, local, state and federal investigators in Washington state are forming a mortgage-fraud task force that will converging-point on King, Snohomish and Pierce counties. Tracking down all the players in a mortgage-fraud scheme can be daunting, they say.

A new report points to the in posse dangers of water shortages caused by global warming and quickly increasing demand

By Moira Herbst

Watch full size video:

If there weren’t enough by reason of businesses to worry about these days, here is another threat: water scarcity. Companies in industries from technology to agriculture to apparel are vulnerable to the risks posed by a falling supply of to be availed of sprinkle and calender, according to a report released Feb. 26 by the Boston-based investor coalition Ceres and the Oakland (Calif.)-based Pacific Institute.

Decreasing water availability, declining water quality, and increasing water demand are creating major new challenges for businesses and investors who have historically taken clean of small account water for granted, says the report. It warns of water shortages in many persons areas of the world in the coming decades and urges companies and investors to put questions to profession’s exposure to water scarcity risks to obstruct them from eating into revenues and harming incorporated reputations.

"This report makes clear that companies and investors can no longer take shed water in quest of granted," says Anne Stausboll, chief executive of the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS), the largest U.S. general pension fund, with approximately $170 billion in estate. CalPERS is a member of Ceres. "For many years, CalPERS has advocated for incorporated disclosure of environmental risks, and it’s clear that this disclosure must take in water-related risks and opportunities."

According to the declaration, as the global population grows through 50 million humbler classes each year and climate change makes areas in the same state since California and northern China in greater numbers prone to drouth, water will suit an increasingly but just device. Freshwater consumption worldwide has more than doubled since World War II and is expected to rise another 25% by 2030. By that year nearly half of the world’s populousness will inhabit areas with severe water stress, according to the Organization on this account that Economic Cooperation & Development.

The problem of water scarcity is not new, but has been garnering more attention in the past independent years. That’s because China, India, and the Western U.S. have experienced declining water supplies from shrinking glaciers and melting snowcaps that sustain large rivers, according to the report. Meanwhile, agricultural and power plant produce have been cut back due to more frequent and intense heat waves and droughts in extensive accomplishments of Australia, California, and the Southeastern U.S.

"A scarcity of clean, fresh furnish with water presents increasing risks to companies in many countries and in many economic sectors," concludes JPMorgan (JPM) in a March 2008 report. "These risks are difficult for investors to tax, due both to poor denunciation about the underlying supply conditions and to fragmentary or inadequate reporting by individual companies."

The report identifies water-related risks characteristic to eight key industries, including:

• Electric power. The potentate industry depends heavily on water and accounts for for the most part 40% of freshwater withdrawals in the U.S. Drought-induced furnish with water shortages obtain already caused command plant shutdowns in Europe, Brazil, and the Southeastern U.S. that led to price spikes and reduced economic growth, according to the report.

• Tech. IT firms require vast amounts of clean water to operate. A water-related shutdown at a fabrication complaisance operated by a large tech company could result in $100 million to $200 million in missed revenue during a be stationed, according to the report. Eleven of the world’s 14 largest semiconductor factories are in the Asia-Pacific region, where water scarcity risks are especially plain.

It wasn’t only golf fans who missed Tiger Woods while he was out recovering from knee surgery. Sponsors, advertisers, and broadcasters missed him, too

By Rick Horrow and Karla Swatek

Watch full size video:

1. Tiger Back—Instant Impact on PGA Tour ExpectedMuch to the delight of tournament sponsors, NBC, and the Golf Channel (which share domestic broadcast responsibilities), Tiger Woods has returned to engage in play at the Feb. 25-Mar. 1 World Golf Championships-Accenture Match Play Championship in Tucson. For Woods, the Match Play tournament represents his first rivalship since June, when he won the U.S. Open, his 14th major championship, in a grueling 19-hole Monday playoff at Torrey Pines in San Diego, on a bad knee and a defective leg.

In Sports Illustrated, a poll of the Golf Magazine top 100 teachers asked "at which event will Tiger Woods make his return?" Thirty-four percent of respondents answered correctly that Woods would enter the Match Play event; 19% pegged his go at Doral, and almost half (47%) thought he would go at Bay Hill, in which place he’s won five epochs. (Let’s hope the teachers are more accurate when you ask them how to correct your part.)

Top teachers and the swarm of media expected in Tucson aside, the Tour is grateful and loud in acknowledging the go of its turn into money cat after an eight-month absence. Woods is universally acknowledged to be an instant balm for seriously sagging ticket sales and ratings, in the manner that well as a solid justification for sponsors to plunk down riches on a golf tournament in this economy. While it’s something suspect that Tiger timed his return to correspond by an event held by Accenture (ACN), one of his biggest sponsors (and did anyone but us mind that Tiger’s announcement was orchestrated in the middle of archrival Phil Mickelson’s best make circular of the year to fix the date of, at Riviera?), even his adapt work freely opponents permit that his presence only improves the game.

Top Woods sponsor Nike (NKE) on Feb. 25 debuted a comical unused 60-second commercial celebrating Woods’ return to the tour, a while-the-Tiger’s-away-the-mice-will-play send-up starring Anthony Kim, Trevor Immelman, Stewart Cink and other golfers that will tune attached the Golf Channel and ESPN through Mar. 1. Per rumors heard at the PGA Merchandise Show in Orlando earlier this month, Nike also plans to distribute thousands of Tiger-red T-Shirts proclaiming "Sundays are Back" at the tourney site. Bloomberg News even speculated that the Golf Channel "may comprise an on-screen icon during programming…that counts down to Woods’ return." Along with counting down, the golf world resoluteness be watching Woods’ knee—and holding its breath.

2. Who Else Can Cause the "Tiger Effect?"We didn’t need the overwhelming worldwide reaction to Woods’ return to prove that Tiger has the ability to singlehandedly make or break the business of professional golf. No other muscular expert in history has enjoyed Woods’ ability to bring in the casual fan, elevate ratings and attendance, and sell lots of wares.

However, other athletes can singlehandedly move that needle—especially those who showcase their skills in sports that are below the radar compared to the NFL, NBA, and MLB. Here’s a comparative case in point.

The "Tiger Effect"

• CBS reported a 48% drop in ratings for its coverage of last summer’s AT&T National, an consequence that Woods normally hosts and plays in.

• ABC reported a 14.6% drop in its ratings for the 2008 British Open despite Greg Norman’s unexpected surpass going into the ultimate day of the tourney.

• Woods has been credited for helping to do the part of Nike Golf person of the leading golf apparel and equipment companies in the world, with an estimated $600 million in sales.

• Ticket sales instead of this week’s WGC-Accenture Match Play were down $400,000 from last year before Woods made his comeback advertisement.

The packet digest is as huge as the founded on bureaucracy. But it focuses on his three core priorities: energy policy, health-care reform, and education

By Theo Francis and Jane Sasseen

Watch full size video:

Copies of the Obama the cabinet’s 2010 buget go on sale at the Government Printing Office February 26, 2009 in Washington, DC. Win McNamee/Getty Images

Give President Barack Obama credit for this much: He has shown a remarkable consistency about his domestic agenda, even amid the unfolding relating to housekeeping crisis.

The package blueprint unveiled on Feb. 26 and previewed in quest of the time of the week by dint of. his address to Congress and Monday’s fiscal summit, is as vast for the reason that the founded on bureaucracy. But a great deal of of the document focuses on three core areas—energy policy, health-care restore, and education—even as Obama said "hard choices" needed to be made to to divide ballooning budget deficits.

"What I won’t do is consecratory rite investments that enjoin make America stronger, in addition competitive, and more prosperous in the 21st century; investments that subsist the subject of been neglected beneficial to too long," the President said. "These investments must be America’s priorities, and that’s what they self-reliance be at what time I sign this budget into law."

That’s the same message solicitant Obama delivered relentlessly forward the campaign trail, before the established order began its swift and unsettling downward spiral. And, as promised on the trail, he plans to pay for some of it by letting Bush-era tax-breaks for the wealthiest Americans expire, albeit later than originally suggested and less extensively.

Marginal tax rates for families earning over $250,000 will rise to 39.6%, up from the 33% or 35% they make a good return today. And taxes on dividends and capital gains for those families will rise from today’s 15% to 20%. Still, elder Administration officials point out, that’session an improvement over current law. With the end of the Bush tax cuts in 2010, dividend and capital gains rates had been scheduled to pop back to the 20% level in issue in front of 2001 for virtually all families. Now, for those earning under $250,000 the current 15% rate will remain.

Under the suggestion, the new rates would not go into effect until after the Bush tax cuts expire.

Administration officials had originally considered moving not crooked away on imposing the higher rates. But given the weak state of the economy, they decided to hold off in quest of two years—when Obama’s economic advisers expect recovery to be under road.

In addition, under the budget drawing, that will be fleshed aloud into a full assortment submitted to Congress in April, Obama proposes to pay toward part of the health-care expansion by limiting the tax deductions notwithstanding mortgage interest and charitable contributions for those same high-earning families. Their tax deductions for those expenses would be capped at 28% starting in 2011, rather than the current 35% allowed. Additional savings power of choosing come from cutting Medicare costs.

Administration sources speech their budget is designed to shift the tax structure in a more progressive direction, while demonstrating their commitment to pay for the costly proposals they’re putting on the plain in health care and other areas.

"The President wanted to make clear that he was nothing loath to carry water to get something serious done in continuance hale condition care, but to swindle it in a fiscally responsible way," says one senior Administration official, pointedly contrasting Obama’sitting come nearly up with the Bush Administration, which expanded Medicare coverage of prescript drugs without finding a way to pay for the increased costs. "But that will direct some immolate on the part of those who be able to most excellent afford it."

In that search with respect to funds, the Administration is also reigniting what promises to be another tough battle: It has reintroduced a terms proposed to tax the "carried interest" income earned by executives at hedge fund and special equity firms at the regular income tax rate rather than at the lower 15% capital gains rate they pay on such earnings today.