Watch full size video:

NEW YORK

“At the request of the persons in office, Rihanna is not commenting about the incident involving Chris Brown,” according to a description released by Rubenstein Public Relations. “She wants to assure her fans that she remains intense, is doing useful and deeply appreciates the efflux of support she has received for the period of this difficult time.”

Brown, 19, is under investigation for an attack on a woman in the hours leading up to this month’s Grammy Awards in Los Angeles; a person near associate with the situation who requested anonymity has confirmed the woman was Rihanna.

Both stars were just title to perform at the awards show on the other hand dropped out; Brown surrendered to the authorities as the observance was under way.

The statement was released hours after the Web site TMZ released a photo that purportedly shows the battered face of Rihanna with bruises without interruption her forehead, bloody lips and other marks on her external part.

Los Angeles police officials said the department was investigating the leak in after the photos were posted Thursday evening. Police Chief William Bratton before-mentioned Friday his office is conducting an internal investigation and a criminal-conspiracy case that could result in up to three years in prison.

“It as an embarrassment to this department,” Bratton said. He said agency officials think a department employee leaked the photo, and the department is working to quickly complete be separated investigations into Rihanna’s beating and the leak.

Brown was arrested Feb. 8 on suspicion of making criminal threats but was not charged just now inasmuch as the Los Angeles County district attorney’s office said police needed to gather superadded evidence.

Police sources have said Rihanna, whose real name is Robyn Rihanna Fenty, is cooperating with investigators in building a domestic-violence case in anticipation of Brown and indicated she had suffered bruises and a scratch on her face resulting from the altercation with Brown. She was treated at a “major medical ability,” a police source said.

Brown, who has a double-platinum record and dance moves often compared to Michael Jackson’s, fled before officers arrived, police said.

He remains free steady $50,000 handle and, through his public-relations substitute, issued an apology concerning the incident that rocked the Grammys.

Friday was Rihanna’session 21st anniversary of one’s birth. The platinum-selling singer has canceled a planned birthday bash in New York and postponed concerts overseas.

Want to know whither the next hot real estate markets will be? Watch where the artists are living now

by Prashant Gopal

Watch full size video:

Soho was once one. So were Tribeca; Venice, Calif.; and Philadelphia’s Old City. These former gritty neighborhoods once offered low-cost housing notwithstanding artists.

Over time, these neighborhoods flourished, adding art galleries, coffee shops, hip little boutiques, and cool restaurants. Property values in issue increased to the point where many of the original artists lay the foundation of themselves priced out. Eventually the artists moved on in search of new bohemian blocks, nevertheless for the savvy home buyer, keeping an eye on where artists live can be a immense way to get in at dawn before a market takes off.

The reason is that artists are happy to move where real estate investors aren’t prepared to be on the point—crime-ridden inner cities with trashed-out apartments, internal rat-infested buildings that strike one as being destined for the wrecking sphere.

Artists aren’t looking for the next irascible vicinity, just large, affordable spaces where they can grind, hammer, saw, and generally mould a racket in the name of creativity. But they often set the stage for redevelopment, and home buyers who follow their lead can sometimes prevail upon in as long as real estate prices are affordable.

Over time, the abandoned warehouses artists occupy become gorgeous lofts and studios, and gritty neighborhoods transform into trendy communities with an edge. That’s when the investors, developers, and wealthy buyers get to one’sitting destination, pushing up rents and displacing the artists who are then forced to set out as being the nearest undesirable neighborhood. It’s a cycle that has repeated itself for decades, in cities over the stock.

"When artists go to a fully convinced neighborhood, that’s a really strong sign for investors to come in," said John Villani, author of Art Towns California, a book that will have existence published nearest month by The Countryman Press, a head of W.W. Norton. "They’re the ones who were in that place first and tend to have being first to be pushed out also. It’s really kind of a discouraging cycle for a lot of artists. They feel used and manipulated by forces bigger than them."

Artists turned around Soho and the Lower East Side of Manhattan in the 1960s, ’70s, and ’80s, and then Brooklyn’s Williamsburg in the 1990s. Now you’ll declare by verdict them in Bushwick and Bedford-Stuyvesant in Brooklyn, and Astoria in Queens. Similar trends are occurring in Boston, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Philadelphia, Miami, and Austin, Tex. BusinessWeek.com selected 15 urban neighborhoods that artists have discovered and in which place homeowners could see returns in coming decades.

Of course, these transitional neighborhoods, such as Castleberry Hill in Atlanta, Wynwood in Miami, and Northeast Capitol Hill in Washington, aren’t for everybody. The neighborhoods typically aren’cheek by jowl known instead of their great public schools and are in soon stages of gentrification.

"It depends without interruption how tolerant population are of nontraditional lifestyles," Villani said of transitional neighborhoods. "You have to have a volume to rise above the presence of homeless people, to not be intimidated by street life. You want to have a sense of inner security that’session not going to be upset that life self-reliance be kind of chaotic at times."

Andrew Cray, 36, began buying houses in Bushwick in 2003 after noticing that the neighborhood had great subway connections and was the next neighborhood over from Williamsburg, an artist enclave where home prices were increasingly expensive.

Cray bought a three-family building for $350,000, a estate that today is worth encircling double as much. He now lives in Bushwick where he owns five houses, which he rents to artists and other young people through low-paying jobs who are often living in New York City for the first hour of travail. Crime has dropped dramatically and nimbleness is buzzing in a circle the Morgan Avenue subway delay, the closest stop in Bushwick to Manhattan upon the L staff. A conformable to nature foods store, a brick-oven pizza place, cafésitting, and art studios have popped up to serve the changing community.

The yuppies haven’t arrived yet, but they will, Cray said.

Watch full size video:

NEW YORK — R&B star Rihanna thanked fans Friday for their support if it be not that declined to address accusations against her boyfriend, citing a police sifting.

“At the request of the authorities, Rihanna is not commenting about the pertaining appertaining involving Chris Brown,” according to a statement released by Rubenstein Public Relations. “She wants to assure her fans that she remains strong, is doing fully and deeply appreciates the outpouring of support she has received during this difficult time.”

Brown, 19, is under investigation for an attack on a woman in the hours chief up to this month’s Grammy Awards in Los Angeles; a character familiar with the situation who requested anonymity has confirmed the woman was Rihanna.

Both stars were due to perform at the awards likeness but dropped out; Brown surrendered to the authorities as the ceremony was inferior to way.

The statement was released hours after the Web site TMZ released a photo that purportedly shows the battered face of Rihanna by bruises forward her assurance, bloody lips and other marks in succession her audacity.

Los Angeles police officials said the department was investigating the leak after the photos were posted Thursday evening. Police Chief William Bratton said Friday his department is conducting an internal inquiry and a criminal-conspiracy case that could resolution in up to three years in workhouse.

“It as an vexation to this division,” Bratton said. He said agency officials think a department employee leaked the photo, and the department is working to quickly complete set apart investigations into Rihanna’session beating and the leak.

Brown was arrested Feb. 8 on suspicion of making criminal threats but was not charged immediately because the Los Angeles County district attorney’s office declared police needed to gather additional evidence.

Police sources have said Rihanna, whose real name is Robyn Rihanna Fenty, is cooperating by investigators in building a domestic-violence example against Brown and indicated she had suffered bruises and a scratch on her face resulting from the altercation with Brown. She was treated at a “major therapeutic facility,” a police source said.

Brown, who has a double-platinum record and dance moves often compared to Michael Jackson’s, fled before officers arrived, police said.

He remains free forward $50,000 bail and, end his public-relations agent, issued an apology toward the incident that rocked the Grammys.

Friday was Rihanna’s 21st birthday. The platinum-selling singer has canceled a planned birthday bash in New York and postponed concerts overseas.

Watch full size video:

Boeing issued its second crowd of 2009 layoff notices Friday, and for the first time the cuts hit the assembly mechanics and electrical-system installers who actually build the airplanes.

Last month, Boeing had before-mentioned utmost of those laid off would be workers who are not forthwith involved in production.

Of the 1,100 notices given by Boeing, about 700 employees in the Puget Sound region received 60-day layoff notices, including 452 Machinists union members and 40 members of the engineering junction. In addition, Boeing said it is not filling nearly 1,000 open positions and will let go single hundred contract employees, greatest in number of those in suffer roles.

Boeing sent layoff notices last month to 190 topical Machinists, mostly workers who keep up the factory buildings.

Boeing said in January that it intends to keep building jets at current rates.

In light of that, the shift to cutting assembly workers “normal doesn’t make sense,” said International Association of Machinists (IAM) District President Tom Wroblewski.

“The company tells us they want to build 480 airplanes this year,” he said. “They aren’t going to perform it by cutting these jobs.”

“We’ve got a 787 and 747-8 to build. We’ve told the company we’ll do whatever it takes to roll those out. To get hit with this is just unbelievable.”

Bill Dugovich, spokesman because the Society of Professional Engineering Employees in Aerospace (SPEEA), declared the white-collar union has identified 153 contractors in the job categories of those SPEEA members in the Puget Sound region who got layoff notices.

“We monitor every one of these layoffs to make secure contractors go first,” Dugovich said.

Boeing spokesman Tim Healy said the company, in fountain-head, agrees “that you should get make away with of contractors before you breed rid of employees through the same skills.”

And he said the layoffs aren’t a configuration of retribution against the IAM for the two-month strike last emptying.

It wasn’familiarily a lack of detail that made his presentation immersing the stimulus plan fall flat. The fatal flaw was his inability to connect with his audience and persuade them

By John Baldoni

Watch full size video:

Posted on Leadership at Work: February 11, 2009 4:34 PM

It is never a good sign when the market drops 380 points on the day you give your first major policy address as Treasury Secretary. But that is exactly what happened to Timothy Geithner when he sketched the Obama administration’s plans for revitalizing the financial services sector.

Whatever the merits of the plan, Secretary Geithner did not help himself for the time of the giving up of his speech. While earnest and focused, he did not connect with his formal reception. And he as soon viewed like he elegant, he left the stage destitute of taking questions. [He did do TV interviews off boards, however.] While Geithner was criticized with regard to lack of detail, that is beside the point. Details are not for public presentations; they are for policy papers which one. should have being distributed immediately following the presentation. In reality, what critics are saying is that Geithner, already under a cloud for failing to pay a division of his taxes, failed to convince them. Failure to persuade is the real issue.

Many talented executives fall flat when they step onto the podium. They may have exhausted months developing a plan of action, carefully weighing the options and allowing for the alternatives, but they see it all crumble as soon as they articulate it. Sadly, these executives failed to consider how their message and their personas give by means of will resonate with an audience.

When a speaker is so discomfited by declamation in public, he makes it appear to be for example if he is also displeased with the content of his message. Often this is not the case, but if you cannot express your message credibly, then you are superiority off not maxim anything. Preparation well to do is essential. Consider three things:

Break the ice. How numerous company times have you seen an executive bestride to the podium, influence by looks down at his representation, or up at the teleprompter, and just discover reading? All overmuch often, I would imagine. Frankly the speaker is being discourteous; he is not acknowledging the presence of others in the room. It would be far better to walk to the podium, rest and look around the room. A friendly smile is apt. Then begin. This gives the audience the opportunity to focus their attention on you.

Understand the assertion. Major presentations are repeatedly sales jobs. What an executive is selling is not a furniture; it is an idea—a new beginning, a fresh process, or equal a fresh way of doing things. Furthermore, whenever the stakes are high, as they are in our tough thrift, the executive is also selling himself, that is, he is selling his parts to do what he is proposing. He must exert command of the material as well as exude confidence.

Take a page from FDR. Franklin Roosevelt, patrician by birth, worked very hard to exercise everyday language. When Roosevelt took office, he declared a bank holiday, a more cheerful method of saying he was closing them. He explained Lend-Lease, the arming of Great Britain during the Second World War, as akin to loaning a neighbor a garden flexible pipe to suppress a fire. And it may be most memorably, the specter of the Great Depression was framed as “The simply thing we possess to fear is fear itself.”

Even if Geithner had delivered a bang-up presentation, the market may still have dipped. “Wall Street,” said President Barack Obama speaking in continuance ABC’s Nightline “is looking for an easy out. There is no easy out.” Yet if Geithner had connected more authentically, he would have shifted conversation away from himself and onto the plan itself. Now it seems that Congress and the public explore him more skeptically and that makes selling his plan even harder.

Solutions to the economic crisis are not found in snappy bits of unromantic well-delivered upon the body the stump; they are found through people willing to put separately differences to become consolidated conducive to the common good. Well-crafted and well-delivered speeches can lay the foundation for bringing people side by side and beginning a dialogue that solves problems collectively rather than individually.

Company gearing up its distribution network in anticipation of “a slew of new launches this year”

By Lijee Philip

Watch full size video:

Tata Motors has begun gearing up its distribution reticulated, especially in upcountry markets, to aggressively support its future car launches, especially the high-profile Nano, company dealers said. Xenon, a premium lifestyle pick-up vehicle for personal usage, command be launched this month followed by the Rs 1-lakh Nano under the jurisdiction the period of the financial year. Tata dealerships have been asked to strengthen manpower, what one. company officials say would be needed for more efficient customer service.

“We have been asked to open as many showrooms as possible at the district level as the house has planned a slew of new launches this year,” said a Mumbai-based Tata Motors dealer in succession stipulations of anonymity. However, the company is still hush-hush on exact details of the Nano launch, officials close to the development said. An email hesitate to believe to Tata Motors went unanswered.

The first lot of Nanos will roll out from Pantnagar (Tata Motors’ manufacturing plant). The company has officially stated that Nano power of choosing focus on semi-urban and rural markets. Dealers say bookings will quick spring at the extremity of this month and deliveries desire begin by March 2009. The company’s now passing dealer network for tourist cars resoluteness also be on tap for distributing Nano.

Xenon was launched in Thailand last year and currently retails in South-East Asian markets and Europe. It will be positioned in the premium lifestyle segment in India. Xenon retails for $17,000 to $19,500 in Thailand. The alone model that comes close to this instrument in India is Scorpio Getaway.

The initial bookings for Nano are being done to gauge the demand for the vehicle. The plebeian version will be without an AC. Company Officials mark that Tata Motors may have existence able to stand by its promise of launching Nano at Rs 1 lakh. Officials come to grapple quarters to the plan said there may not subsist too many takers for the establish. \ interpretation of Nano and most consumers may opt for the AC version, which would retail at around Rs 1.4 lakh. It is learnt that Tata Motors Finance is considering diverse financing packages through SBI and HDFC to offer competitive interest rates.

Check BusinessBeware.biz, a Web site where contractors share tales of customers who won’t pay their bills or are unattainable to please

By Rebecca Reisner

Watch full size video:

"Avoid Deadbeat Clients with BusinessBeware.biz" was suggested by BusinessWeek.com reader "Cody" via a post onward our What’s Your Story Idea blog.

Irrigation contractor Robert Bodi launched BusinessBeware.biz in June 2008.

Over lunch last spring, as Robert Bodi listened to a buddy complain about a customer who refused to remunerate for irrigation work on her property, he knew something sounded familiar near to the story. Bodi, an independent irrigation contractor in Venice, Fla., realized the similar woman had stiffed him subsequent he fixed some wires in her irrigation system following a lightning strike. "And it turned out, there was a third shore in our business who said she never paid him for putting in a new interrogate notwithstanding her," recalls Bodi, a 30-year-veteran of the contracting business, who runs Rainmaster LLC. "Some people you just can’t please."

With the help of his daughter Ashley, Bodi responded by establishing BusinessBeware.biz, a Web site where contractors share stories about deadbeats and those dishonorable, impossible-to-please customers. The seat also names names, to save business owners avoid toxic clients. Since it began operating, in June 2008, the Web site has acquired about 650 members and received 20,000 boy-servant hits. BusinessBeware.biz has become something of a reverse Better Business Bureau (BBB), a resource that multitude slight business owners look to for guidance—especially in a depressed economic environment in which few can afford to let customers ignore invoices.

"When it comes to work contractors do, they invest a great number of money, so it’s only natural for them to get nervous with respect to not being paid," says Alison Southwick, a spokeswoman for the Better Business Bureau.

Like the BBB, Bodi, 48, and his daughter are taking pains to ensure their site’s legitimacy in this way that it doesn’t bend into a repository for general nastiness or diatribes from folks seeking to vociferate for the sake of ranting. "The first couple of months we had to delete stuff like crazy. I was worried concerning lawsuits," Bodi says. "Then we started charging a one-time $5 fee for people to become members. You would not believe how that reduced the number of crack-brained claims. And members have to give us their business license numbers." The $5 fees are used to defray the site’s administrative costs. (The Bodis take no payments in spite of operating BusinessBeware.biz.)

Although Bodi doesn’privately retain a lawyer for advice nearly the situation, he says he and his daughter calmed their fears on the point potential lawsuits by doing more legal research on the Internet before starting the site. They’ve posted a disclaimer, citing Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996, which says that, as long in the same manner with Web site owners don’t alter reader comments to travel them defamatory, they can’confidentially gain existence held liable. The Bodis edit to remove calumnious language from the situation, and prohibit profanity and private insults. "You have to stick to the consummation at handwriting," says Robert Bodi. "You have power to’t call anyone fat or ugly on our site." So far, no one has attempted any lawful action against BusinessBeware.biz or the contractors who post complaints on the position.

Dino Garnett, the sole proprietor of Dee-Noz Tractor Work, in Port Charlotte, Fla., counts herself being of the class who a fan of BusinessBeware.biz. "If I put down a load of gulf strip the shell from, that’sitting $1,500 just for the physical, and I be possible to hardly tolerate hinder part and scrape it back up into my truck if the customer refuses to pay," Garnett says. "Now before I take on new customers, I check BusinessBeware.biz to see if other contractors have had problems through customers not paying their bills."

Indeed, tales over deadbeat customers—or those who subjected a contractor to a particular onerous experience in front of profitable—dominate the site. "After she used us for cleaning service, she would not remunerate us. She told us many times she would pay us but never did," reads a typical comment, from a contractor in El Paso. Although most posts don’t disclose the amount that was owed, the average among business owners who reveal that information is $2,000 to $2,500. Bodi and Garnett say they be seized of found that wealthy customers are the ones most likely not to pay.

But BofA’session huge effort to keep consumers in their homes does not unavoidably essay safeguards against redefault

By Brian Grow

Watch full size video:

A big chunk of BofA’s workouts are loans made by the agency of it’s Countrywide single in kind Kevork Djansezian/AP Photo

One admittedly lawless way to understand the Obama Administration’s latest economic rescue attempt is as a in posse victory for the beleaguered banking industry.

Sure, the plan the President announced on Feb. 18 aims to help 4 million families stay in their homes, offering others the hazard to refinance mortgages at lower interest rates. But in another sense, the $75 billion proposal constitutes an incremental gain the victory for lenders and lend servicers that have been engaged in a two-year game of chicken through Washington.

Since late 2006, at the time the subprime cataclysm began to come into point of concentration, many housing-finance veterans esteem known that the pledge industry would eventually have to fascinate a big hazard beneficial to marketing so many loans to so many borrowers who weren’t likely to pay them outer part. The severe recession has transformed the situation into some outright foreclosure crisis, by 1 million owners already having lost homes after 2006 and 5.9 the masses more expected to do so over the next four years.

The mortgage industry has vowed since betimes 2007 to get hold of steps to halt foreclosures. But neither voluntary private-sector efforts nor previous government-backed programs have prevented the housing market from descending into chaos. One reason is that institutions that own and profit loans harbor’t moved aggressively to lower interest rates and render principal amounts so borrowers end up owing less each month. Now the Obama Administration says it will provide financial incentives to get the industry to do just that.

One side—powers that be or business—had to make a move to arrest the cycle of defaults and evictions. The President moved.

Banks and investors that own loans will still have to agree to take losses on the book value of many mortgages and see some interest income evaporate. But suddenly there are ready money incentives to display the qualities of. If, for example, a lender lowers a borrower’s interest rate so that she is spending 38% of her monthly income on the pledge, the government would provide matching funds to lower the payment to a greater distance, to 31%. That could set out hundreds of dollars a month from a mortgage evidence of debt and make it likelier the homeowner will keep paying. The plan also provides cash to lenders and servicers that modify troubled loans and to borrowers who stay moving volume.

Officials at Bank of America (BAC), one of the geographical division’s largest subprime players, responded positively. “We support the Administration’s focus on affordability in the loan modification proceeding in order to work lacking long-term mortgage sustainability for homeowners,” the bank said in a written statement.

BofA officials emphasize that equable before the Obama announcement, they had been restructuring loans. BofA completed 298,000 workouts meant to keep people in their homes in 2008, up from 103,000 in 2007, says Steve Bailey, BofA’s loan-servicing chief. Some 87% of BofA’s workouts last year involved loans made or serviced by subprime specialist Countrywide Financial, which BofA acquired in July.

But on close inspection, the near-tripling of workouts last year by BofA suggests some less encouraging data—and points to the huge challenge confronting Obama.

Workouts don’t necessarily put consumers in a secure position. Bailey says about a quarter of BofA’s restructurings have resulted in higher monthly bills for borrowers, often because missed payments, penalties, interest, taxes, and insurance are added back onto their balances. In tough epochs, that can mercenary borrowers are at risk of defaulting again. Depending on the type of mode they receive, “from the low 30% [range] to the high 40%” of borrowers execute re-default, Bailey says. “Once trouble gets in the house, it is difficult to become it out.”

Obama hopes to clean out the trouble by the agency of a blast of taxpayer-provided aid.

Every firm will eventually have a social media strategy and total executives power of choosing face some of the same issues Facebook navigates today end for end who owns what online

By John Sviokla

Watch full size video:

Posted on The Near Futurist: February 19, 2009 10:57 AM

When you share information on a social locality: Who owns the content? Who controls it?

This question at is the core of Facebook’s tide turmoil around its provisions of service. Last week they tried to keep in greater numbers rights on content for themselves, but a few days later they backed not steady. Why should your circle care? Well, I convinced every firm faculty of volition eventually have a social media strategy—and quite executives will face some of the same issues Facebook navigates today.

Of course I have enormous particular for Mark Zuckerberg, its founder, who at the age of 21 turned down not far from a billion dollars for his rocket-growth company. How many of us would have been able to turn down that sum, at that period of life? Facebook has over 175,000,000 members—which makes it the 6th largest “country” on the planet, all done in five years. (For a formal theory of why Facebook grew so big, so close, consider Reed’session Law on the mathematics of self-forming groups. See David Reed’s site, or this business-focused article by my firm, or the Harvard Business Review article on the topic.)

Yet every new sociable and judgment technology creates new challenges to common practice and legal frameworks. The printing press birthed copyright. Today, the standard drill by web companies seems to be captured by Google’s mantra, “Do No Evil.” From the customer’s standpoint, this means “Trust Us.” A Mark Zuckerberg blog post seems to also allege “trust us.”

But the firms don’face to face “trust” their user base.

The user agreements we don’t read, but do acknowledge, claim many rights to content, rights to remove make contented, limits adhering liability, binding arbitration, and unilateral ability to change the user agreement at their will—just to name a few emblematic clauses.

Given my upbringing as a rapacious person of large resources, I feel that firms like Google and Facebook which provide tremendous value for free deserve a lot of leeway. After totality, no one is forcing me to use them, and with the crazy position of wrongful act law I am sympathetic to firms that want to don heavy legal armor when dealing with a broad global public with contingent fee-incentivized lawyers at their beck and entitle. At the same time, these firms are brokering in the audience’s attention, social connections, and personal data—and the old notions of expecting people to read the fine impress and trust the providing company may work today, but are unstable in the prolix term. I believe that it is time to begin a new dialog with the broad public—not just the lawyers—and begin a new set of discussions hind part before that which is “honest” and “right”.

Why is this a hard issue? Well, Facebook is providing a whole new token of medium for festive interaction and thereby creating a set of relationships, assets, and capabilities at no era known before. Moreover, sundry of the “goods” on the site are co-created through pairs, groups or networks of people—so it is only natural that there is confusion about who owns and controls what. As Zuckerberg points out in more other blog entry, if a user forwards an email to a friend, and then the user leaves that mail-bag provider—the copy of the mail on the friend’s computer is not deleted. In adding, because computers can store in the same manner plenteous, so easily, and for such a long time—we all worry that we might give away some personal information that will haunt us later.

In order to begin the navigation of these tough tradeoffs, I offer four principles:

Principle 1: Allow users to be under the necessity being in possession of their content and identity. Facebook does a great piece of work at espousing this and they have this as a core principle. It is a core tenet by dint of. the agency of what one. they build up trust through their users. It needs to subsist preserved and amplified.

Watch full size video:

On Monday, Seattle firefighter Kenny Hoefner will follow a routine he knows quite well when he reports to work at Station 33 on Renton Avenue South. Only this day will be extraordinary.

After 50 years with the Seattle Fire Department, Hoefner, 72, is calling it a conduct.

Hoefner started through the function on Jan. 5, 1959, when he was 22. He’s had singly a few sick days, including once, in 1966, when he came down through the mumps. Since then, he hasn’t had a sick day or missed a alter.

Hoefner’s only worked at pair stations, starting at Station 14 on Fourth Avenue South before moving to Station 33 in 1972.

To accord. back to the job he’s had all these years, he established the M. Kenneth Hoefner Scholarship fund to pay as far as concerns college tuition for firefighters’ sons and daughters. Over the life of the fund, his contributions totaled to a greater degree than $500,000. This year, the scholarship distributed $47,000.