A directive from the Obama Administration on fuel efficiency is creating alarm among automakers

By David Kiley and David Welch

Watch full size video:

President Obama’s method to the Environmental Protection Agency to review whether to grant a government waiver that could allow California to pass tougher fuel thriftiness and emission standards instead of automakers than the federal government could significantly change the vehicle choices consumers have in the nearest decade.

If the EPA grants California a waiver, the move would own the state to require that vehicles achieve fuel economy equivalent to 35 miles by four quarts by 2017, three years earlier than mandated by a federal disposal passed in 2007. The new fleet average would be 42.5 mpg by the agency of 2020.

California also would make it tougher in some ways for the auto companies to meet the state regulation than the federal one. That’s because carmakers have been preparing to meet the commencing federal standard with future vehicle plans that include smaller engines, electric vehicles, and hybrids. But the phase-in of the California plan starting in 2011 and accelerating to 2017, they say, could force rapid price hikes on vehicles and slam automakers already hurting from the global recession. Under the rules, the auto companies would have to invest remote more in new technology.

"Our nation’s automakers are struggling—drastically restructuring and shedding jobs just to stay afloat," Antonia Ferrier, a spokeswoman for House Republican Leader John Boehner of Ohio, said on Jan. 26, shortly subsequent to the White House disclosed Obama’s directive. "And now they are being forced to wear away billions of dollars to comply with California’s emissions standards in the room of using that money to save American jobs."

Auto industry executives aforesaid on Monday that they didn’t see the President’s statement viewed like the final word on letting California have its way. Several spoke upon the body background only, citing the sensitivity of negotiations that are apprehension place between the car companies, Congress, and the White House over the new regulations, as well as the federal loans to General Motors (GM) and Chrysler. "I noiseless think we will be devious up with unit public regulation that may be tougher than what we hold now, but perhaps won’t case as far as California wants," says individual auto collection lobbyist.

The Bush Administration recently approved $17.4 billion in loans to GM and Chrysler, and Ford (F) has applied to the government for a $9 billion line of credit. The uncertain finances of the Detroit automakers and their exigency for government support have removed some of the companies’ lobbying clout to fight fuel economy regulation favored not no other than through the Obama Administration but by Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.).

Besides the accelerated schedule for reaching a 35 mpg effort; labors average, the biggest automakers—GM, Ford, Chrysler, Toyota ™, Honda (HMC), and Nissan (NSANY)—all object to an rejection given to automakers that sell fewer than 60,000 vehicles a year in California until 2016. That would give Volkswagen, Mercedes-Benz (DAI), BMW, Hyundai, and Subaru, in the same proportion that well being of the kind which possible recently made known companies from China and India, an advantage over Detroit and leading Asian automakers. Even environmentalists want that provision cut. "That is a loophole we would like to pay attention eliminated from California’session law thus the playing field is level," says David Friedman, senior analyst at the Union of Concerned Scientists.

Automakers complain, too, that the law could result in GM and Ford as well as Toyota being artificially limited in how many pickup trucks they can take a bribe for in California, and the 12 states that follow the Golden State’s lead, especially after the economy rebounds. "There could be all on the other hand a black mart for pickups in those states," said one concerned Detroit executive.

How in such a manner? Under the California law, some companies could have to cap how sundry people trucks and sport-utility vehicles they sell to comply with regulations. Businesses could contrive up out-of-state companies to buy and make a record of trucks and SUVs, and then be forced along them into California and other states. Also, the law as it is written affects new cars and trucks, but not used vehicles with more than 7,000 miles on the odometer. "Detroit might gain to drive the cars to California and sell them as used instead of shipping them by truck," joked one executive.