‘Mass Mods’: Will Help for Homeowners Be Enough?
All the programs for troubled borrowers offered by banks and government may not be enough to check the tide of foreclosures
By Dean Foust
Jonathan Gray
The lump efforts to modify mortgages and stave most distant foreclosures sound weighty. JPMorgan Chase (JPM) is reaching out to 400,000 at-risk customers. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are freezing foreclosures until 2009. Some 500,000 distressed borrowers at Citigroup (C) could get relief over the next six months. But just if banks have being up to their promises, the initiatives may not be the panacea the housing market of necessity.
Following the lead of state and federal agencies, many of the industry’session biggest lenders have announced plans in recent weeks to drudge out troubled mortgages by satirical rates, deferring principal, or extending the lengths of loans—all designed to lower borrowers’ monthly payments and keep people in their homes. But absent further steps, the not to be disclosed and public programs together will help only about 2 the public homeowners, fewer than a quarter of the borrowers expected to face foreclosure through 2010. Those tallies could rise if unemployment, now around 6.5%, climbs higher than 8%.
Not altogether borrowers should be saved. After all, some foreclosures are important to set free the market of people who should never have gotten a loan in the first place. Also, real estate speculators, individuals who bought a second or third home, and not clear borrowers aren’face to face suitable to realize relief.
A necessary purge aside, the outlook isn’t pretty. If banks practise manage to prevent all 2 the public foreclosures, the number of homeowners who default each year will still subsist four times higher than earlier this decade. It’s understood with difficulty to stabilize home prices while defaults are hitting records. The programs “are just a distil in the bucket,” says John H. Maher at banking consultancy LECG (XPRT).
Despite the grand gestures, banks part hurdles in reworking loans en masse. Lenders have power to easily revamp the mortgages they own completely without interruption their books, otherwise than that they don’t always esteem the authority to change loans sold to investors in mortgage-backed securities.
The legal battles could deviate soon. BusinessWeek has learned that a prominent wealth management firm plans to file suit in early December in contact through one of the nation’s largest banks over the bank’sitting loan-modification program. The firm alleges the bank won’t absorb the losses from cutting pledge payments, passing them off instead to investors.
It may also take a while according to banks to kick their programs into high array. Consider AIG Federal Savings Bank. As part of a 2007 agreement with its regulator, the Office of Thrift Supervision, upward of predatory lending practices, the unit of insurer AIG set aside $178 million to surety out borrowers. Some 18 months later, the thrift has refunded only $48.4 million in fees, according to regulatory filings. AIG Federal Savings has also cut the overall size of its program by $53 million, leaving just $76.6 the public to modify loans. The bank wouldn’t disclose how many mortgages, if any, it has revamped so far. “AIG Federal Savings Bank [and an affiliate] have provided relief for thousands of customers consistent with the terms of the [regulatory] agreement,” says any AIG spokesman. OTS officials say the program is moving.
MANY BACKSLIDERSMeanwhile, there’sitting no guarantee that troubled borrowers who get a new loan won’t become repeat offenders. Most of the new plans humble a homeowner’s monthly mortgage bill to 38% or 40% of their aftertax income. But that still tops the norm of 28%—and borrowers tend to buckle under high payments. Historically, roughly 50% of modified mortgages sour after a few payments, according to Lender Processing Services (LPS), a Florida loan-processing firm.
A JPMorgan spokesman notes that of the 400,000 borrowers flagged for lend modification under its new program, some 40,000 have already been bailed out by the surround with a bank at least one time according to the time of the past two years. Says Mark Fleming, chief economist at First American CoreLogic (FAF), a mortgage industry consultant: “Loan-modification programs have a high recidivism rate.” That suggests the hangover from the housing bust could last for quite a while.
With Brian Grow in Atlanta and Mara Der Hovanesian in New York
View Slide Show
