India has thrived under Bush’s pro-outsourcing policies, and many Indians hope for to a greater distance prosperity with McCain

By Mehul Srivastava

Watch full size video:

A sand sculpture of US presidential candidates John McCain (L) and Barack Obama (R), created by Indian sand artist Sudarsan Pattnaik, is seen at a beach in Puri adhering November 2, 2008. SANJIB MUKHERJEE/AFP/Getty Images

It is an oft-repeated withhold in the 2008_election season that even while America remains torn between Senators Barack Obama and John McCain, the trust of the world has overwhelmingly chosen Obama. Poll after person shows how the invasion of Iraq, the detention of prisoners at Guantánamo, and the sagging popularity of President George W. Bush have translated into a battering of America’s image abroad—and by enlargement, soured the world on a Republican President.

But in the American-style shopping malls and 24/7 call centers of modern India, where McDonald’s franchises sell paneer tikka wraps and American flags adorn the walls of outsourcing firms, the beyond eight years of a Republican Presidency have been fantastic. That approval of a Bush Presidency has overflowed into a wellspring of support for another Republican Presidency, making India one of those rare countries in the world where support for Obama’sitting historic run has not resulted in a landslide of public opinion in his favor. Indeed, depending without interruption which poll you look at, Indians each prefer McCain and Obama equally, or Obama by the smallest margin in the world.

India’s enchanting with the U.S. has grown in direct put in proportion to their economic intertwining: The more business Indians do with Americans, the else they seem to fall in love with them. Indeed, during the season that the earth has grown disenchanted with America during the Bush Presidency, Indians have grown to be appropriate to its biggest fans.

Billions of dollars and millions of jobs be the subject of flowed to India since 2000, igniting an economic engine that has changed the fortunes of urban Indians, and tied their financial futures closely to the U.S., a country that most will never visit. But viewed like many persons Indians spent hours on the phone through American customers, walking them through their daily tribulations with merit cards and misplaced online purchases, it created every understanding of America—and Americans—that divide through geopolitics. "They’re a lot like us," says Ranadeep Sen, 24, who spent three years at a call center that handled computer-related problems for Midwesterners. "They have their problems, but it’session not taste they are all trying to conquer countries and kill civilians. Their cars break down, their computers break down, they have trouble [paying bills]."

Couple that with a Bush-sponsored nuclear deal, which while creating tens of billions of dollars of business opportunity in the place of American companies, also helps India emit its status as nuclear pariah, and Indian Prime Minister Manmohan wasn’t well-nigh from the truth when he declared to President Bush in Washington earlier this year that "the people of India to love you."

In two separate polls carried out by the Pew Global Attitudes Project and the BBC, Indians have been amidst the most supportive—and appreciative—of American outward and housekeeping policy. Among Indians, 59% held favorable views of the U.S., second but to Nigerians, according to the Pew survey. Between Obama and McCain, the choice remained almost a cold heat.

More recently, a BBC survey of 22 major countries showed 49% of the respondents preferred Obama, compared through just 12% for McCain—composition a 37-point lead for Obama. But in India, that lead shrank to just nine percentage points. (One caveat: That poll was conducted about the Democratic convention but before the Republican convention—and before McCain’s choice of Alaska Governor Sarah Palin as his running mate.)

In his popular "Swaminomics" column for India’s largest English newspaper, The Times of India, Swaminathan S Anklesaria Aiyar added up the relating to housekeeping benefits of McCain as compared with Obama, and reached the conclusion that a McCain Presidency would be good in the highest degree for India. He found that McCain voted against trade barriers 88% of the time, and against send abroad subsidies 90% of the time. This contrasts sharply with Obama, who supported both of those measures. In 2007, according to Aiyar’s survey, Obama voted to lower visa quotas for Indian engineers (BusinessWeek.com, 5/18/07) working in the U.S., and moreover supported subsidies for U.S. farmers. Opposition to those subsidies (BusinessWeek.com, 7/30/08) which was single in kind reason India and other developing countries refused to approve lengthwise with a proposed World Trade Organization distribute earlier this year. "It volition be great to take a calamitous U.S. President," wrote Aiyar. "It would have being equal greater if he followed McCain’s economic policies."

Even though the excitement of Americans potentially electing a minority President is palpable in discussions by Indians who follow the U.S., there is a clear element of self-interest in for what cause most Indians view the two candidates. "Their ideas on Iraq or terrorism or global warming all seem the same to me," said Sanjiv Singh, 32, a bank-employee. Singh, who plans to visit relatives on the West Coast nearest year, had driven to the shops in Delhi’s crowded Bhogal market on Monday afternoon in a Chevrolet Spark. "What matters is simple things," he says. "Is in that place going to be more economic growth? Are they going to back us or Pakistan?"