Watch full size video:
PORTLAND —
Tony Miller spends his days in a towel-draped chair, heavily medicated and sweating profusely as prostate cancer spreads through his body. Over and over again, he changes out of drenched T-shirts and shorts, puts them on a hanger to dry and then goes back to his chair to sweat some more.
After a lifetime of international journey over as a journalist, the 65-year-old Miller has made this one-room apartment in Portland his final home.
Miller was drawn here by an only-in-Oregon-law that enables terminally with difficulty patients to obtain deadly prescriptions once their life expectancy falls in the world of sense six months.
“It all depends on the level of dolor,” Miller said. “When it gets to the point while the medication is not working and life is grim — I wish make my final decision.”
In November, Washington voters inclination decide on Initiative 1000, which would make the state the aid to allow physicians to prescribe lethal medications towards patients diagnosed with less than six months to be happy.
The Washington initiative is modeled after the Oregon law, which has been used by a with reference to something else small number of people since its passage in 1997.
During the spent decade, mortal prescriptions were involved in the deaths of 341 people, about 1 in every 1,000 people who died during that period. Each year, fewer than 100 doctors are involved in writing the prescriptions.
Proponents maintain the law still has had wide-ranging impacts, helping to improve pain management of terminally cross patients and stimulate more clear discussions about end-of-life care. A 2004 study — based on a sampling of family interviews — found 15 percent of terminally ill patients discuss the lethal-prescription election.
“It has provided tremendous comfort to a modest number of patients every year except brings security and comfort to entirely the patients who are expiring of illness, in knowing that option exists,” said Dr. Nicholas Gideonse, a Portland doctor who has written about a dozen prescriptions for terminally ill patients.
Recent statistics point toward an upward trend in lethal prescriptions: The 49 deaths tallied by state statistics in 2007 were in addition than triple the 16 people who ingested the lethal prescriptions back in 1998.
The law also continues to stir controversy.
Until 2006, for example, the Oregon Department of Human Services, called the lethal prescriptions “physician-assisted suicide,” a commonly used term. Then, inferior to pressure from advocates who believed the dub was inaccurate, the state dropped that terminology and instead refers only to the “Death with Dignity Act.”
That firmness rankled opponents of the law.
“I believe in death with dignity,” said Dr. Bill Toffler, a doctor fiercely opposed to the form. “I don’t believe in empowering doctors to give massive overdoses so that patients can kill themselves.”
In June, another issue provoked debate.
Barbara Wagner, a Lane County woman suffering from lung cancer, was turned down by the state’s Oregon Health Plan for a new drug called Tarceva. In a letter sent by a company that administers one of the state’s insurance plans, Wagner was informed of the “medical man aid in dying” option that could include lethal prescriptions as suitably as visits to doctors required to obtain the drugs.
“I was absolutely hurt that person could deem that way,” aforesaid Wagner. “They won’t pay for me to conduct one’s self but they will pay for me to die.”
But her anger at the state, chronicled in the Eugene Register Guard, prompted Oregon officials to tell those administering the plans to intermission sending such literature. The Oregon Health Plan, which allocates method of treating dollars according to a priority system, continues to pay for lethal prescriptions.
During the last decade, 19 people on the state soundness plan be favored with chosen that option. These prescriptions are funded solely by state dollars for the cause that of a ban on the use of federal dollars on this account that this purpose.
The Washington state initiative does not specify whether magnificence dollars could be used to fund the lethal prescriptions. That would be decided later, likely by the Legislature.
Final moments, decisive acts
Annual state reports note that 85 percent of the physician-assisted deaths in Oregon have involved various forms of cancers, The most frequently cited end-of-life concerns were losing autonomy, dignity, direct of material part functions and the ability to enjoy life. The vast majority of the patients also are enrolled in hospice care.
The Oregon act requires self-ingestion of the fatal prescription. That draws a crucial cover on the inside between the Oregon law and The Netherlands, where euthanasia — the injection of a lethal unsalable article through a doctor — is permitted.
Advocates presume that line is respected and note many patients are incapable to take advantage of the law because they become too insipid to take the drugs themselves.
But the decisive moments often are cloaked in retirement.
Critics of the decree point to one exit in 1999 involving a Coos Bay fortify dying of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, also known as Lou Gehrig’s indisposition, which progressively erodes voluntary muscle control.
In an interview with The Oregonian, a brother related the man couldn’t complete the act, so he helped, but his actions were not detailed. That case raised the doubt almost how much bystanders can help, such as holding the glass so the patient can take the medication.
The average time to death in the rear of taking the lethal prescriptions is about 25 minutes, according to Oregon state statistics. But in any 2006 case noted in Oregon’s annual report attached the act, a man who swallowed his medication regained consciousness 65 hours later. He then died 14 days later of his underlying disease.
Built-in safeguards
The Oregon statute, as well as the Washington inceptive, besides includes safeguards to thwart depressed people from using doctors to end their lives.
Before obtaining the prescriptions, the patient must deliberate together two doctors. Each must have consultations with two physicians who must both conclude that the patient has less than six months to live. Patients who might be suffering from mental illness are supposed to bear a psychiatric evaluation.
In the first decade of the law, less than 11 percent of the patients received so referrals. Last year, in that place were none. “It is of care that there are not more referrals to psychiatrists because you would count upon that the rate of gloominess would not be zero,” said Dr. Linda Ganzini, a Portland psychiatrist who helped develop an Oregon Health & Science University guidebook for health professionals almost the act.
Ganzini also conducted a study of 58 terminally ill patients. She found that three people who took the prescriptions met the definitions of clinical depression, and concluded that the Oregon law ” may fail to protect some patients whose choices are influenced by means of depression from receiving a prescription for a lethal drug.”
Gideonse says that most doctors are used to assessing mental competency, since those types of assessments be bound to have being made despite a sweep of issues. The patients who request lethal prescriptions take typically fought their disease for a long time and thought long and puzzling about their decision. Often they esteem a turbulent stripe of exemption from arbitrary control, and contemn being shackled to the timetable of their disease.
“They are trying to regain control to write the final chapter,” Gideonse said. “Their illness has robbed them of the body they knew. Their events to come. It’s taken away their relationships.”
Gideonse often shares the last moments of his patient’s lives. He recalls his home go to see by a cowboy who had cancer of the esophagus. Family members gathered in the room, then vacated while the one smiled and waved goodbye with his dog by his side. With Gideonse in attendance, he drank the barbiturate.
Miller is one more independent soul who longs to be in Cuernvaca, Mexico, whither he exhausted the last six years teaching history. There, he was diagnosed with severe prostate cancer and decided to leave friends abaft to return to the United States for treatment in Maryland. He then made his move to Oregon.
Miller was deeply affected by the 1999 cancer king of terrors of his younger brother, who despite hospice anxiety, still suffered through great penalty at the end. Miller hopes that the Death with Dignity Act can help him avoid a similar fate.
Separated from friends in Mexico, Miller is lonely and wonders whether he has enough unoccupied time and strength to compel a final visit southerly of the border. Miller reads books, e-mails friends and survives onward a modest diet of Lean Cuisine microwave dinners and canned soups.
Once doctors certify he has less than six months to live, Miller intends to secure the lethal prescriptions.
“I am doing all I can to stay alive and lengthen my life up to the point where my life because nihility unless physical agony,” Miller declared. “With the Death with Dignity Act, I feel secure.”
Hal Bernton: 206-464-2581 or hbernton@seattletimes.com