Berkshire Hathaway-controlled MidAmerican Energy will help sell Chinese-made charged with electricity cars in the U.S.

by Frederik Balfour

Watch full size video:

Alex Wong/Getty Images

Warren Buffett has taken a green leap in advance. Des Moines-based MidAmerican Energy, controlled by Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway (BRKA), plans to pay about $231 million for a 10% stake in Chinese auto and battery builder BYD Co. which expects to perform a revolution gone out full electric cars before the end of next year.

The give represents Buffett’session first strategic investment in China and shows he’s betting onward other energy in a greater way. "I think the world has concluded we emergency to solve the CO2 puzzle," says MidAmerican Chairman David Sokol. "One area we fust seriously affect is transport."

BYD made a splash at the Detroit Auto Show in January when it unveiled a prototype hybrid marked by the agency of electricity car (BusinessWeek, 1/10/08), what one. it said it would export to the U.S. by 2010. The backing of Berkshire Hathaway, which owns 87% of MidAmerican, will help BYD launch a fully electric car, selling for about $20,000. "Warren Buffett is very well respected globally as well as in China, so as an investor he will help us build our quality," says BYD Chairman Wang Chuanfu.

The success of the charged with electricity car program depends in succession the ready availability of charging centers, and that’s where MidAmerican comes in. Sokol says the association will alleviate set up charging facilities at traditive gas stations and shopping mall parking lots. As the visitor has the largest cause of renewable energy in the country, much of which can be made use to charge car engines during off peak hours, says Sokol. "We can drop these charging stations anywhere," he says. "If you shortness a rapid charging one in your garage it will cost between $2,500 and $3,000 to install." He figures the annual energy cost to run a BYD-made electric car, based on 12,000 miles per year, would be about $400, compared with $2,400 by reason of a traditional gas-powered car with fuel priced at $4 per gallon. What’s more, the spiritedness consumed by an electric car in the U.S., assuming the national average of 51% of power supplied by coal, would produce just 2.5 tons of carbon dioxide, compared with six tons for a conventional car.

MidAmerican is also discussing with BYD how to set up a U.S. dealer network for the electric car, which would likable go be pointed to head through offerings from industry heavyweights Toyota ™, General Motors (GM), Ford (F), and Chrysler. "It’sitting an opportunity to look at the old model of car distribution and prepare it right for the next century," says Sokol. The electric cars will be initially shipped entirely built, but that assembly in the U.S. would make greater degree sense in the slow run once volumes grow, he says.

The news of the deal has met with an enthusiastic response. While shares in BYD were halted on Monday, shares in an affiliated company, handset builder BYD Electronic, soared 71% in Hong Kong. "This is the most exciting news in China’sitting auto industry," says Michael Dunne, managing director of J.D. Power China (MHP). "They are a formidable investor which brings trust to the picture, in such a manner BYD can say ‘Yeah, we can do this.’" BYD plans to begin selling the F3 DM (or dual mode) hybrid car by the close of the year in China, while it will roll out the fully electric car, called the E6, by the extremity of 2009.

The House leadership is left wondering what can possibly bring enough votes to pass a financial rescue

by Jane Sasseen and Theo Francis

Watch full size video:

Once again, it is back to the drawing board for the Treasury’s proposed $700 billion extrication plan for the financial industry.

In a development that stunned Washington after more than a week of intensive negotiations (BusinessWeek.com, 9/28/08), the bailout bill failed in a vote in the House early Monday afternoon, Sept. 29.

The vote started at 1:30 p.m. and was supposed to bear been completed quickly. And, given the bipartisan support the reworked measure got over the weekend—with Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and President George W. Bush winning the backing of key Democrats like Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and the likely support of Presidential candidates Barack Obama and John McCain—the House leadership was counting upon a positive issue. But by a small scale after 2 p.m., only 205 House members had backed the bill, vs. 228 against. The hedging-knife needed 218 to pass.

Most of the shortfall came from the President’s hold party. Only 66 House Republicans voted for the bill, by 132 against. Congressional leaders predicted they needed at least 80 supporters from the GOP and at one point hoped to get 100. Among Democrats, 141 backed the bill and 94 voted against. The legislation, as has been obvious since Secretary Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke first told congressional leaders relief was needed 11 days ago, lacked encouragement from a rebellious band of conservative Republicans who are dead set against the plan and the notion of the government vexation of that kind an extensive role in fixing the private sector’s woes.

Even before the final votes were tallied. the stock market started tumbling. The Dow Jones pertaining average initially sank 705 points on the word—the Dow recovered somewhat, but plunged anew in late trading to finish the floor 778 points, or 7%, to 10,365.45 (BusinessWeek.com, 9/29/08). The Nasdaq index, loaded with big-name technology stocks, suffered even worse, falling penuriously 200 points, or 9%, to 1,983.73.

The debacle in the House left lobbyists and Congress members alike scrambling for an explanation. "The legislation may have failed, but the crisis is stop by us," aforesaid Pelosi in a constrain conference held at so early an hour after the vote. While she pledged to go back "for another bite at the apple," it was in great part from obvious how the bill could have being revived.

Lobbyists from both sides of the aisle were equally stunned. "I can’t quite think there’s been anything liking this, ever," related Damon Silvers, associate general counsel for the AFL-CIO. One well-connected—and exhausted—business lobbyist pointed out there is not at all Plan B.

By the cessation of the afternoon, however, the search for alternatives had begun. Some suggested that a promised be held in the Senate sooner than continuing in the House; a triumph in that place would put grievance upon the body recalcitrant House members. Following a meeting at the White House, Paulson told reporters that the agency’s toolkit is "substantial but insufficient." He added that Treasury would do what it could given the tools it has "to protect our financial system and the management" in light of the charges’s bankruptcy.

Still, he said, "we need to utter something back in the same place that works." He added that ordinary Americans and small businesses were suffering from the financial system’sitting stresses. "Families, too, be impressed the credit crunch as it becomes more difficult to get car loans or a student loan," Paulson said.

Congressional leaders also held a series of meetings to try to find a way encourage, in hopes of getting a revised deal passed by week’s end. While small in number specifics about those talks emerged, analysts and lobbyists closely following the talks said they faced a series of difficult choices. Conservative Republicans, who call on the costly bailout as every affront to their free-market values, remain the most strongly opposite to it.

Just about every major stock in technology, from chipmakers to consumer electronics titans to Web stars, was dragged into Wall Street’s slide

by Arik Hesseldahl

Watch full size video:

While much watchfulness on Sept. 29 was fixed on the failed bailout vote in Congress and its contact on the Dow Jones pertaining average, tech stocks also came under pressure.

The technology-heavy Nasdaq dropped 199.61 points, or 9%, to 1983.73, the third-largest percentage decline ever. Computer public funds alone lost about $113 billion in place of traffic value. The Sept. 29 tech-stock rout was eclipsed only by the Black Monday crash on Oct. 19, 1987, when the Nasdaq plummeted more than 11%, and Apr. 14, 2000, when it tumbled 9.7%.

Among tech stocks, the most notable loser was computer and consumer electronics creator Apple (AAPL), the subject of at least brace algebraist downgrades. Apple ruthless 22.98, or more than 17%, to 105.26, the copartnership’s fifth-biggest decline in percentage terms. The overthrow wiped $20 billion from Apple’s market capitalization and came eight years to the day after Apple’s biggest-ever one-day percentage decline—on Sept. 29, 2000, it lost more than moiety its value.

Investors sold tech on concerns that, barring a bailout for the financial sector, cutbacks in lending will cause companies to trim or procrastination orders without ceasing computers, software, networking gear, and other tech products. Wall Street’s woes are also depressing consumer tender susceptibility and could make on this account that a bleak end-of-year selling season for consumer electronics makers and online retailers. "Tech is not at the epicenter of the problem," says Doug Freedman, managing director at American Technology Research in San Francisco. "[But] tech definitely carries higher-than-average multiples and above-average risk for the reward. We’re at a point where people have little tolerance in spite of risk."

RBC Capital Markets (RY) analyst Michael Abramsky cut his rating on Apple, citing survey data showing consumers are less determination to spend on consumer electronics. At Morgan Stanley (MS), analyst Kathryn Huberty cut her rating for the cause that of pressure in continuance Apple’s gross margins—costs are rising for back-to-school promotions and other products. Apple shares finished the day down nearly 48% from their all-time high of 202.96 on Dec. 27, 2007.

A Sept. 26 report from Andy Hargreaves at Pacific Crest Securities in Portland, Ore., claimed that Apple has curtailed manufacturing orders for its iPhone, cutting its target to 14 million from 18 million. Hargreaves’ note followed reports that Apple was reducing its purchases of remembrance chips (BusinessWeek.com, 9/24/08).

Shares of Research In Motion (RIMM), maker of the BlackBerry wireless emblazoned bearing, dropped more than 12%, to 61.73. That followed declines earlier in the month after RIM issued a forecast below analysts’ estimates. RIM has destroyed 58% since reaching a 52-week high on June 19.

Computer makers also came under fire. Analyst Doug Reid of Thomas Weisel Partners (TWPG) downgraded computer hardware giants Dell (DELL) and Hewlett-Packard (HPQ), while Wachovia (WB) analyst David Wong downgraded the entire computer hardware sector. HP cruel 3.26, or nearly 7%, closing at 44.55, while Dell lost 1.59, or to a greater degree than 9%, to finish at 15.41. Hard drive constructor Seagate Technology (STX), newly listed forward the Nasdaq, fell 0.68, or additional than 5%, to close at 11.74. Software giant Microsoft (MSFT) fell more than 8%.

Other losers included chipmaker Intel (INTC), which fell 1.93, or more than 10%. Wireless chipmaker Qualcomm (QCOM) dropped 13%, as did cable TV provider Comcast (CMCSA). Software giant Oracle (ORCL) dropped 1.85, or within a little 9%. Cisco Systems (CSCO) fell 2.03, or else than 8%. Satellite radio disquiet Sirius XM (SIRI) fell more than 18% to close at 0.62 a share. It has been mercantile for less than 1.00 a share since Sept. 11 and remains in risk of being delisted.

Internet companies weren’t immune. Search giant Google (GOOG) sententious precept its lay by drop 50.04, or 11.6%, ending the set time on 381, its earliest do below the 400 mark in two years.

Online retailer Amazon (AMZN) fell greater quantity than 10%, while eBay (EBAY) dropped 11%. Yahoo (YHOO) also depraved more than 10%.

NEW YORK - Stocks continued a repercussion following a private research group detail that Americans’ confidence in the economy has improved in September.

WASHINGTON - President Bush warned Tuesday that failing to pass a financial retake plan would bring harsh consequences to the U.S. economy. “Congress must act,” he declared in an appeal that one as well as the other presidential candidates echoed.