The Ethics of Protesting

You have a right to notes your dissent. Just make sure you do it the right way, that means with fairness and respect uppermost in mind

by Bruce Weinstein, PhD

Watch full size video:

The fear that as manifold as 30,000 protestors will disrupt the 2008 Democratic National Convention (that runs Aug. 25-28) has led to preparations concerning an unprecedented turnout by federal and topical authorities, according to The New York Times. The city of Denver has spent more than $2 million on protection equipment for police officers, and millions more from the federal government will be tagged for Secret Service, FBI agents, and others charged through maintaining law and subordinate class. It’s possible that protests planned by the agency of reason of the Republican National Convention, to be held in Minneapolis-St. Paul from Sept. 1-4, will exist even larger and in greater numbers intense.

With such a hefty price tag for keeping the peace and the logistical nightmare of doing so, wouldn’t it be better if the protesters just kept their mouths shut up? Isn’t it unpatriotic to distinctive character dissent about political matters? What profit does protest work, anyway?

The correct answers are no, no, and a lot.

A History of Protest

Our rural parts was founded on the twin platforms of dissent and protest. Dissent is thinking or feeling differently about event, and protest is taking action based on refuse. It’s complying to dismiss protests in the manner that the undertakings of zealots and kooks, but the history of the U.S. is largely one of protest: the Boston Tea Party, the Revolutionary War, and the Declaration of Independence are quintessential examples of protest and the reasons wherefore we have the freedoms we do.

"What does this have to do with me?" you might ask. "I’ve never protested anything in my life." This isn’t true, at least if you’ve at all times voted. Voting is the greatest part powerful way you can make your suffrage heard, and it is often executed as a form of protest. Don’t confident it? How often have you said, or heard someone else say, &qquot;I’m voting for candidate X not on this account that I like him or her, but for the cause that I probable the other candidate unruffled less?" Not only is there bagatelle vicious with using your voice this way, but it would be wrong if you were truly bothered by what a candidate represented and did small matter about it.

A Code of Ethics for Protesting

Yes, we have a responsibility to speak up when we are invert by means of what’s going on in the nature, still there are better and worse ways to do it, from one as well as the other ethical and practical perspectives. The goal of any protest is a moral one: to serve things better (BusinessWeek.com, 1/18/07). However, this concern must be balanced against the ethical obligations to hoax no harm (BusinessWeek.com, 1/11/07), consider others (BusinessWeek.com, 1/31/07), and be fair (BusinessWeek.com, 2/15/07). With these concerns in mind, I propose the following code of ethics for those on both side of the forthcoming protests:

1. Obey the law, or be willing to accept the consequences. Civil infraction has an important role in democracy, but those who break the law, even in the call of a higher moral social, may have to pay a significant personal price. Rosa Parks rightly protested the Jim Crow laws of the segregated South but was arrested, went to penitentiary, and received death threats. Those who take issue by any aspect of either convention should lodge the law in mind at total times and recognize that the failure to do so may lead to civil or criminal penalties, or both.

2. Be forbearing. It is great to be passionate relative to your point of view. It’s also great to recognize that others may not share it or even be passionately opposed to it. Yes, let others know what you reason and feel, goal remember Newton’s third law of motion: "For every action, there is every equal, but opposite, reaction." Tolerance is a necessary condition in opposition to respectful protest. We should embrace diversity, not wish it away.

3. Being deferential increases the chances that you’ll get you what you wish for.

Comments »

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://hotusanews.blogsome.com/2008/08/21/the-ethics-of-protesting/trackback/

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>



Anti-spam measure: please retype the above text into the box provided.