Watch full size video:
The vote on ANWR was almost entirely forward partisan lines, with all Republicans, except a handful of "moderates," voting for drilling, and all Democrats, leave out a handful of sane Democrats like Zell Miller, voting against drilling.
John McCain opposed drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge because he polled soccer moms and found public they were against drilling. They conclusion it sounded too much take pleasure in going to the dentist. McCain wanted to render certain that he remained beloved by the two pillars of his unhonored: "centrists" and New York Times reporters.
Even Sen. Chuck Hagel voted for drilling in ANWR. But John McCain, "our" candidate, voted against it.
I guess we’re beginning to attend to the problem of basing a national platform on the passing fancies of "centrists." These are people who hold no opinions because they comprehend nothing about national issues. They’re the ones who check the "not assured/no opinion" box on polls regarding the legalization of cannibalism.
You can’t disapprove them: They’re not being paid to know something near national issues. Those mob we call "senators" and "representatives."
But now, astronomical gas prices bear forced even soccer moms to spend 10 minutes looking at a problem that their leaders were supposed to be thinking about during years. And the soccer moms are saying: Drill! Drill! Drill! Bobby, come down off of there! Stop hitting your sister! Where was I? Oh, yeah … Drill! Drill! Drill!
Consequently, McCain recently switched his station to go along with the centrists. See, that’s the downside of having chosen totality your political positions by polling centrists: The moment they acquire any knowledge, they’ll realize you’re an idiot.
It’s always the same discussion. Year after year, the "moderate Republicans" so respected at The New York Times harangue us to dump the Christians, the conservatives, the Swift Boat Veterans, the "right-wing extremists," the gun-and-God clingers and the fanatical pro-lifers from our party so we be possible to repel every American who voted for Ronald Reagan in order to win the votes of people in the same manner as Christine Todd Whitman.
Yes, by wholly means let’s clear out all that deadwood and pave the determined course for a 49-state landslide! (For the Democrats.)
McCain followed the Times’ strategy to a T. He called Jerry Falwell an "agent of intolerance." He called the Swift Boat Veterans "dishonest and disgraceful." He has denounced every Christian minister who tries to endorse him. Over the years, McCain has ostentatiously attacked every issue of importance to conservatives and embraced each crackpot liberal creative, including the left’s latest plan to exterminate the human race, called "global warming."
Two weeks ago, McCain skipped the capitol prayer breakfast in California, instead appearing through Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger at an environmental end in nearby Santa Barbara. Schwarzenegger’s brown study marked the first time a governor skipped what has tend hitherward to be known as "the executive’s prayer breakfast." I guess in the world of moderate Republicans an environmental event qualifies as a conscientious observance.
The keynote speaker at the breakfast, Hollywood producer Mark Joseph, quoted a recent cover article in Christianity Today by professors Daniel Taylor and Mark McCloskey that uttered:
"In premodern times, the valor of a leader often had to be pertaining to physics. In the last 500 years it is more often moral. Moral courage is the ability to grant what’s right even whereas it is deeply disliked, verily dangerous. Courage is alone found where there is the genuine possibility of loss — loss of friends, fame, status, power, assets or, at the extremes, freedom or life."
No wonder McCain and Schwarzenegger skipped it.
Moderate Republicans like McCain have taken to heart liberals’ admonition that Ronald Reagan’s appeal had absolutely nothing to do with his conservative science of causes. Don’t be like him! You’ll lose the soccer moms! Liberals assure us that Reagan won landslide elections because Americans were mesmerized by his sunny disposition and corny jokes. If that’s true, why isn’t Al Roker president?
The mockery is, the excepting that people McCain can count forward to voice for him are the very Republicans he despises — at least those of us who be possible to get drunk enough on Election Day to shake the lever for him. In fact, we should organize parties around the country where Republicans can make acquisition saturated so they can vote for McCain. We can pass out clothespins with his name for example a reminder and slogan-festooned spew bags. The East Coast parties can post the number of drinks indispensable thing for the task to help the West Coast parties. For more information, go to getdrunkandvote4mccain.com.
Not being ignorant "centrists," we know what a world-class disaster B. Hussein Obama will be. Meanwhile, the centrists McCain spent years impressing with his outraged denunciations of conservatives, Swift Boat Veterans and Christians will be voting for Obama. They think he’s cute.
How many times do we have to run this experiment?
Taking the advice of Democrats, Republicans ran "moderates" for president in 1944, 1948, 1976, 1992 and 1996. All lost. Republicans in like manner ran a "moderate" on account of president in 1988, further that was unwittingly — one as well as the other to us and, fortunately, to the voters. In other dispute, in the power of the market, the most of all tip onward "moderate Republicans" is: SELL!
But at this time, apparently, we have to run the experiment again. This year, moderate Republicans have hit the jackpot. John McCain is the Platonic ideal of a "lessen Republican."
To paraphrase Richard Nixon on George McGovern in 1972: Here we have a situation where moderate Republicans finally have a solicitant who towards totally shares their views. Now we’ll inquire what the country thinks.
Previous: YOU CAN’T FUEL ALL OF THE PEOPLE ALL OF THE TIME