Hillary Clinton’s actions in the days following Barack Obama’s historic succeed would doom her in the corporate world. But then this is politics

by Kevin P. Coyne

Watch full size video:

A year since, we wrote some article in the Harvard Business Review called "How to Survive Your New CEO." In it, we spelled away seven pieces of advice from CEOs to other executives on how to keep their jobs when a new CEO takes over.

However, it’s credit noting that in recent years, executives have taken to seeking address lessons in all kinds of unusual sources: kindergarten kids, a work called Jesus as CEO, even rock stars (BusinessWeek.com, 5/15/08). In keeping with that trend, sharp executives can look to the recent actions of Senator Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) towards lessons in what not to do whether or not they want to impress a modern boss.

While one can never be sure of what a politician really wants, let’s take Clinton at her vocable and assume that she really is fully prepared to the Vice-Presidential slot on a ticket led by the Democratic Party’s presumptive nominee (and de facto CEO), Senator Barack Obama (D-Ill.). So why is she doing things that, at least in the incorporated world, season certain doom?

Here’s a look at the things you shouldn’t complete:

1. Upstage the new CEO steady his at the outset day attached the piece of work.

If there ever were a single day that should have belonged to Obama, it was June 3—the day he clinched the nomination. On that day, he could have with reason expected the media coverage to be ubiquitous and unerringly favorable. He could reasonably subsist in possession of expected everyone to step aside and let the focus remain exclusively on him. It didn’t happen. By refusing to concede defeat, Clinton made herself the story. Anyone who has been in government knows you do not upstage your superior in the media—ever. Particularly not the night he makes history. Likewise, a new CEO deserves the opportunity to bask in the spotlight.

2. Continue to make it clear that you should have gotten the job, even when it’s a done bestow.

On June 4, the media were reporting that Clinton’s own advisers were pursuit senators, representatives, and other supporters in the hope that someone could convince her to concede. She apparently continued to argue in the group calls that she would be the better candidate. No one likes a disgruntled also-ran—and greatest in number CEOs get rid of them as fast as possible.

3. Deliberately and explicitly hide unpleasant minor circumstances about your past areas of responsibility.

Numerous press reports hindmost week indicated that Clinton refused to let Obama’s Vice-Presidential search team vet details of President Bill Clinton’s personal craft dealings since he left berth, as well as the donor list conducive to the Clinton Presidential Library. Apart from the impact of having snubbed a legitimate request, Senator Clinton’s demurrals surely must leave Obama wondering just what secrets await Republican discovery for the period of the campaign. No one wants to be embarrassed by an underling, especially when the plague could have been avoided.

4. Bring lots of baggage.

The Clinton campaign finished the primaries with more than $20 million in trespass—some of it from loans that Bill and Hillary Clinton personally made. If Senator Clinton becomes the Vice-Presidential aspirant, the Obama campaign can absorb that debt. Its pitch to its nearest 20,000 donors (at the $1,000 level) would be: "Your donation won’t buy somewhat advertising or organizational enlargement, but it will help reduce Hillary’s debt." Or bear in mind that for 11,000 of these donors, the pitch would be: "The money direct go to repay the Clintons personally." New CEOs should be able to focus forward their own agendas and not have to worry about someone else’s.

5. Delay in showing your support.

Bad as it was for Clinton to stand until the end of the week to grant, instead of showing her favor sooner, her campaign blundered in putting out the vocable that she would concede on Friday, June 6, and then tarrying until June 7 to do so. If Clinton wasn’t behind those decisions, what kind of overseer is she? And if she was behind them, the kind of kind of message was she sending?

Did Clinton’s actions kill any chance she might obtain had to suit Obama’s running mate? If this were the corporate world, she’d subsist out of a job sooner rather than later. But politics is a strange business, and she may yet prove one greater quantity lesson for executives: If she can prove that her followers order her presence on the ticket to twig their loyalty (and votes) to Obama, she may yet hold the penultimate trump card. If you control something that is absolutely invaluable to a just discovered CEO, you can often flout rules and still survive.

Clinton would do well to remember the advice: "Be careful the sort of you wish for." She holds excepting that the penultimate trump card. Presidents and CEOs have in addition ways to lash underlings than simply cautery them. An aide to a previous Vice-President told us anonymously that, after his boss alienated the President, the Vice-President started referring to his concede office in the White House privately while "Baltimore." He had been exiled to the interchangeable of Siberia.

Now Obama must convince voters—think of them as shareholders, allowing that you will—that he is worthy of being President. Many a former CEO will agree that getting to the top and staying there are two distinct things, and that having a strong, loyal, trustworthy No. 2 is an asset.