Is a Presidential Rally Coming Up?
B-school gurus say a President’s term has links to Fed actions and funds. Plus, the Old Boy network in mutual funds, and health-care beefs
by Maggie Gilmour
Stock indexes may be down 3% to 8% this year, but if history is any guide, there’s a heck of a rally around the quarter. In a recent paper in The Journal of Portfolio Management, Scott Beyer of the CFA Institute and business school professors Gerald Jensen and Robert Johnson statement public securities pay off the most at what time a President enters the second half of his designate, based forward analysis of Presidential terms from 1957 to 2004. The authors credit the pattern to the Federal Reserve, which they set down tends to sink interest rates once a President passes the midway point. True to form, the Fed began dropping rates in 2007. So how come the Russell 2000 fell 1.6% last year and a further 6.5% through Apr. 30? Jensen, a finance professor at Northern Illinois University, blames the honor crunch.
It seems the Old Boy network gets you more than an invitation to LinkedIn or the country club. A study published by Andrea Frazzini, an collaborator professor of finance at the University of Chicago Graduate School of Business, finds that mutual fund managers who invest in companies headed by dint of. the agency of fellow college alums get bigger returns. The study, co-written by Lauren Cohen at Yale School of Management and Christopher Malloy of Harvard Business School and submitted to The Journal of Political Economy, says investments in "connected firms" outdid nonconnected businesses by an average of 8.4% a year from 1980 to 2006.
Why? Frazzini has three hypotheses. One is that people exchange information more freely with people they know and have ties to. The second is that these connections accord artful info for the reason that favorably: "You cancel a golf date through me, I infer things are not going well with the business, I sell stock," he says. The third part theory is darker, suggesting some smudges under that white collar: "Insider trading was involved."
Criticizing Health PlansHealth insurance companies have plenty of critics. Now they have one in greater numbers: Leemore Dafny, an collaborator professor at Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management. Insurers argue that because they compete in opposition to individual another, they keep prices down, saving everyone money. Not necessarily, says Dafny in a March paper, Are Health Insurance Markets Competitive? Dafny looked at facts from 1998 to 2005, on condition to her by a benefits consulting firm, that tracked the behavior of 200 major companies to see whether they shopped around to find the cheapest insurers. Dafny found that when these big companies made more money, their insurance providers raised their premiums. But in the room of dropping the carrier to procure a better deal, Dafny writes, companies as the world goes stuck by their freedom from disease insurers and paid more. "Carriers have power to and do take advantage of a firm’s increased profits and extract higher prices from them," she says.
