Watch full volume video:

Icahn launched a proxy campaign in continuance Thursday to replace Yahoo's board with directors who would reopen talks with Microsoft, saying Yahoo had acted irrationally in refusing the giant software group's $47.5 billion bid.

Microsoft walked away from its pursuit of Yahoo two weeks past following three months of negotiations when Yahoo's board rejected Microsoft's sweetened offer of $33 a share, saying the company was worth at in the smallest degree $37 a share.

The software giant's move on Sunday was that may be liked to prompt the billionaire investor to press Yahoo to further pursue a possible affinity by the agency of Google, the source related.

"Microsoft is trying to get the milk without buying the cow, and if you look at Icahn's history, he has never been used that street," said this person. "He does not want to see Yahoo pushed into some joint danger with Microsoft and is not going to exist used to push Yahoo into it."

Microsoft's statement in succession Sunday related it was "considering and has raised with Yahoo each choice that would involve a transaction with Yahoo still not an acquisition of all of Yahoo." It did not clarify which that choice might be.

The New York Times reported that Microsoft and Yahoo may fashion a partnership or joint venture notwithstanding search-related advertising to take on Google Inc, which dominates the search mart with a share significantly larger than a combined Yahoo and Microsoft.

For its part, Yahoo continues to talk with Google Inc about a search advertising partnership and a deal could come as early as this week, a origin familiar by the talks said on Thursday.

Microsoft emphasized it was not proposing to make a new bid to buy everything of Yahoo, after recently being rebuffed, but could reconsider.

Yahoo replied later on Sunday that it continued to consider a number of strategic alternatives and was "enter upon to pursuing any event which is in the best interest of our stockholders."

The company's entertainment will "evaluate each of our alternatives, including any Microsoft scheme, consistent with its fiduciary duties, with a focus on maximizing shareholder value," Yahoo said in a statement.

It added it had confirmed with Microsoft that it was not interested in "pursuing each acquisition of all of Yahoo at this time."

ANALYSTS SPLIT

Analysts were split on the benefits of an alternative scenario to a full-fledged takeover.

"I definitely think an other deal is better than a full acquisition," said Toan Tran, analyst at Morningstar. "It is positive for both companies, because you are getting the benefits of a Yahoo acquisition without the negatives, namely the integration risks."

But Kim Caughey, a senior analyst at Fort Pitt Capital Group, before-mentioned the market direct probably send Yahoo shares higher space of time pushing down Microsoft shares when the emporium opens without ceasing Monday.

Caughey said a joint venture or minority investment with Yahoo could cause confusion about who was in charge.

"Microsoft walking away from Yahoo was a total head fake," said Caughey. "Microsoft is a terrible poker player if it thought people were going to give credit to that the deal was dead."

Meanwhile, Microsoft and Icahn have not held discussions from one place to another Yahoo, said another source coalesce to the company.

In a letter to Icahn last week, Yahoo board Chairman Roy Bostock said a of the present day board would not be in the best interests of Yahoo investors, adding Yahoo would consider any deal from any party, including Microsoft, if it offered the visitors well stocked value.

Icahn, who has said he had accumulated 59 million shares and options in Yahoo, moreover has the support of Paulson & Co, a $30 billion hedge fund that has amassed a 3.4 percent stake in Yahoo, and other investors upset by the board's handling of negotiations with Microsoft.

(Additional reporting by Megan Davies in New York, Anupreeta Das and by Sinead Carew; Editing by the agency of Gerald E. McCormick and Anshuman Daga)

GILMER, Texas —

Watch full size video:

Broad areas of grazing land at Pete Gipson’s farm have plow-like scars. But it wasn’t an out-of-control mechanical device that left disjointed ruts and holes.

Gipson and other ranchers and farmers in the South are tormented by herds of voracious feral hogs. The beasts, up to 3 feet tall and 400 pounds, devour fodder intended for livestock and tear up pastures in their incessant search for food.

The hogs show little respect for similar barriers as in barbes wire fences, which solely serve as backscratchers as being their hairy, leathery hides.

“They got in that yard a couple weeks agone and cultivated it,” uttered Gipson, 67, as his pickup truck bounced across a once-smooth pasture at his 300-acre Red Cap Farms. “I smoothed it out and I’ll have existence damned if they didn’t come back the next night and cultivate it another time.”

In Texas, the wild pig population - things being so topping 2 million - is exploding thanks to high reproductive rates and hardly any natural predators.

The Texas AgriLife Extension Service estimates the hogs cause $50 the great body of the people in detriment each year.

A dissolution to the pig problem might come from a lab at Texas A&M University, to what a team of researchers is testing an oral contraceptive on this account that the hogs and other pests. It may even become applicable for pets like cats and dogs.

The contraceptive, called a phosphodiesterase 3 inhibitor and in development as far as concerns about a year and a half, is things being so in a covering figure and has been fed to captive pigs at the university’s research facility. It prevents the females’ eggs from maturing.

“It does appear to be effective,” aforesaid Duane Kraemer, a professor of veterinary physiology and pharmacology who heads the research team.

“The animals can prolong to cycle and breed. Their behaviors are the same, except they don’t get pregnant.”

Still, Kraemer cautions, the “expanding of an oral contraceptive for an fowl of the air that people eat and is to have being released into the environment is a compage issue, no question about it.”

The hogs are descendants of animals introduced more than 300 years ago by dint of. Spanish explorers, domestic hogs that have escaped over the years and survivors of Russian boars brought to Texas in the 1930s as exotic hunting game.

Watch filled size video:

Melinda Gates seldom gives interviews, but the co-chair of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation recently led the pursuit for a new chief executive, character of a other thing hands-on role she is playing now that her three children are in exercise. She sat down with Jeff Raikes, the Microsoft president who will join the foundation as CEO in September, to respond questions from The Seattle Times, ranging from his salary to her figurative age. Below is an edited transcript.

Q: One criticism of the foundation has been that it’s very technology-centric, at the expense of a more broad-based approach. Will a CEO coming from Microsoft reinforce that view?

Gates: That critical remarks comes from people a little bit not understanding at which place we’ve been through the bottom, what we’re trying to accomplish.

When you shrink a mission as broad like what we’re trying to do, you have to spasmodic effort through what you’re good at. Bill and I both come from technology backgrounds, we both have a fundamental trust that technology delivered to people in [the] developed universe, like vaccines, is a marvel technology … So we started there, because it’s our core reliance and it’s our background, but we always knew we would expand out. It’s not that we don’t go out to the developing world and see huge problems of poverty and craving for food.

Raikes: I would add that while certainly not all my experiences map unambiguously, if you think about my role in the software industry, what Microsoft has done, a great allot of our result has been thinking about the broader system of delivering the technology to the people who be able to application it.

Microsoft has 750,000 partners … Similarly, the Gates Foundation has a excessively large number of grantees who play an extremely important role … I have been very lucky in that my role wasn’t just about writing collection of laws. You could do a software product, but then you hold to design it for a particular market, you have to know in what condition to obtain to that market, you have to have the right partners to deliver it.

Q: What’s the greatest inequity you’ve seen with your own eyes?

Raikes: India is perhaps the best model for me for you have such an incredible difference. You shore up in these incredibly discriminating hotels and then you drive along the street and see these people who are sleeping on the streets and just striving to survive. I’ve had that personal experience in another geographical division and I’ve had that experience here.

When Tricia [Tricia Raikes, his wife] and I unquestionable to take on the leadership of United Way King County, we weren’t going to just do it to raise funds. We were going to immerse ourselves in the mission. I went out on the One Night Count of the homeless in Seattle to such a degree I could get a better understanding of what that is like for the people who are homeless, further also in the place of the leaders who are cogitative about this challenge.

Q: Is your taking a salary a motivational thing … inasmuch as obviously you don’t need the money?

Raikes: This is something that Bill and Melinda decided as part of how they wanted to run the foundation. For me, the amends is a nonissue. It’s not something that focuses me or motivates me. I’m to this place because of the opportunity to do this work.

Tricia and I have been quite clear for some time that our wealth will be invested away from the thicker settlements into society. We’re already doing that via the Raikes Foundation. My compensation, whatever it is, will go back to cure others.

Watch replete glutinous substance video:

The threat appears in recruiting banners hung across roadsides and in publicly situated death lists. Cops win warnings over their two-way radios. At least four high-ranking police officials were gunned down this month, including Mexico’s acting treaty police chief.

Mexico has battled for years to undefiled in heart up its security forces and win them the public’s respect. But Mexicans generally assume police and even soldiers are corrupt until proven otherwise, and the respectable ones lack available means, drill and the assurance that their colleagues are watching their backs. Here, the taboo on cop-killing familiar to Americans seems hardly to apply.

Police who take on the cartels feel isolated and vulnerable when they become targets, while did 22 commanders in Ciudad Juarez when drug traffickers named them on a handwritten death list left at a monument to fallen police this year. It was addressed to “those who still don’t believe” in the power of the cartels.

Of the 22, seven have been killed and three wounded in assassination attempts. Of the others, all but single in kind have quit, and incorporated town officials said he didn’t want to be interviewed.

On Sunday, city spokesman Sergio Belmonte confirmed that Juarez’s police chief had submitted his abdication and said he would be replaced by a military official attached leave from the armed forces.

“These are attacks directed at the top commanders of the city police, and it is not just happening in Ciudad Juarez,” Mayor Jose Reyes Ferriz said at the funeral of the latest victim, police counsellor Juan Antonio Roman Garcia. “It is happening in Nuevo Laredo, in Tijuana, in this entire region,” he said. “They are attacking top commanders to destabilize the police press.”

The killings are in replication to a crackdown launched by President Felipe Calderon, who has sent thousands of soldiers and federal police across the nation to confront the cartels. Drug lords have hit back by sending killers to attack police with chirography grenades and assault rifles.

Police are increasingly giving up. Last week, U.S. officials revealed that three Mexican police commanders have crossed into the United States to request place of refuge, saying they are unprotected and fear for their lives.

“It’s almost like a martial fight,” said Jayson Ahern, the legate agent of U.S. Customs and Border Protection. “I don’t deliberate that generally the American public has somewhat sense of the level of violence that occurs on the border.”

On May 8, Edgar Millan Gomez, who had taken over as acting federal police chief, just 10 weeks previously, was shot through a uninhabited gunman outside his Mexico City apartment. Police blamed the Sinaloa cartel and declared a police officer was amidst the suspects arrested.

The U.S. Embassy in the capital flew its flag at half-staff. “Mexico has lost another hero,” Ambassador Tony Garza said in a statement. “Mexico has lost too manifold heroes in the try the fortune of arms against criminals and drug cartels.”

Mexican government institutions didn’t lower their flags, but held elaborate funerals.

In Ciudad Juarez, police have been given assault rifles — they used to just carry pistols — end also are instructed not to patrol streets sole. More than 100 of the city’s 1,700-member force have resigned or retired since January.

Soldiers are besides in the cartels’ sights. The Zetas, any infamous group of soldiers-turned-drug hit men, strung banners beyond highways with slogans such as “The Zetas want you — we offer real salaries to soldiers,” and taunts about low army pay.

The conflict has become a fight for the allegiance of police and civilians.

“Juarez Needs You! Join up and become part of the city police,” respond enormous city billboards. The jobs offer salaries about three times higher than those offered by the foreign-owned “maquiladora” factories that are the city’s biggest industrial employer.

But police and soldiers keep deserting to the cartels, giving traffickers inner part knowledge about strategy and surveillance.

And because of their story of bribery and abuse, police and soldiers run into suspicion as they patrol the border slums where traffickers throw children’s parties, hand out cell phones and employ taxi drivers and youths as lookouts.

A Mexican army captain leading all over a dozen soldiers raiding a Ciudad Juarez lane gazed over a maze of alleys, shacks and, in the distance, El Paso, Texas, gleaming in the sun. He said the drug lords’ spies are everywhere, tipping off their bosses to approaching troops.

Many residents grumble of heavy-handed army tactics.

“These guys don’t care surrounding anything,” Lalo Lucero, 44, a former migrant worker in New Mexico, uttered as he watched soldiers stop a neighborhood youth. “They came into my house independently of a warrant, searched from one side everything and told me to sit on a couch and not say anything.”

The army’s public relations customary duty did not reply to requests concerning comment. But authorities have tried to rectify the troops’ image by blanketing Ciudad Juarez with pictures of a soldier manning a machine gun and the war cry “We Are Here to Help You.”

Stoves, refrigerators, and other appliances used to be the core of General Electric’s business. But now the hot growth is elsewhere

by Matt Vella

View Slide Show

Watch filled size video:

By jettisoning common of its most iconic units, General Electric (GE) would join a microscopic except high-profile club of companies that famously parted ways with businesses one time synonymous with their brand names. Companies such as IBM (IBM) and Eastman Kodak (EK) have also—either for of fiscal straits or tactical maneuvering—transformed themselves by letting go of ventures that formerly defined them.

Analysts be inclined probably dispose of the next weeks analyzing the financial minor circumstances and potential bidders for such a deal. The proposed joint venture, spin-off, or outright sale of GE’s appliances division could, after all, bestow the company a much-needed injection of as much resembling to $8 billion. But how exactly GE exits a emporium so intertwined with its public image may, in the end, be in possession of being more interesting than any pecuniary fine print.

The central consequence conducive to the disposal at GE—as well in the same proportion that cohorts before it at Intel (INTC), IBM, Kodak, and Corning (GLW)—is whether to cut loose a reliable, albeit declining, generator of cash to fortified post potentially riskier bets on innovation, research and development, and new growth. Back in the early 1980s Intel’s Andy Grove took the radical step of shifting the assemblage’s focus away from basic computer memory chips, toward microprocessors, the "brains" of the machine. The decision, that was controversial and shocking to some, led to unprecedented increase of Intel revenues, profits, and prestige.

IBM, meanwhile, retooled to focus on delivering high-margin services, ultimately selling its PC hardware division to the Chinese firm Lenovo in 2004. And more recently, Kodak and Corning transformed themselves by refocusing on the digital equivalents of businesses that made them famous, morphing consumer film and glass kitchenware empires, respectively, into cutting-edge digital imaging products and high-end fiber optics gear.

Now, GE could have being at a similar crossroads. Its resource business represents a unimportant fraction of the company’s revenues, about $7 billion of its $173 billion total in 2007. CEO Jeffrey Immelt has said the company’s future putting out will largely subsist fueled by its health-care and energy businesses, a great deal of of it from outside the U.S. By simile, the company’s industrial segment, of which appliances are a large part, accounts for only 10% of overall earnings and books the bulk of its sales inside of the U.S. "In many ways," says Scott Anthony, president of Watertown (Mass.) consultancy Innosight, "GE has even now changed and this is form official what the market has already sorted out."

All businesses have a natural life round of years, and many successful ones fade with time. The artifice for managers is to time their entry and exit to maximize go on investment. "The origination and destruction of business is which gives these conglomerates long life," says John Kao, founder of Kao & Co., a San Francisco innovation consultancy. "The management of a corporation like GE should be complimented for entertaining this kind of transfiguration, even if it the wherewithal turning away from an iconic pursuit."

While millions of Americans still associate the GE name with kitchen appliances, its image has changed over time. Most twentysomethings today are in all probability more likely to associate the company name with a subplot of the GE-owned NBC television comedy 30 Rock. (In the program, Alec Baldwin’s character, a GE executive, is head of the "Television and Oven Programming" division.) "Most in one’s teens people know GE as a media company," notes Andrew Zolli, founder of New York innovation firm Z + Partners. (Rumors of a sale of NBC, meanwhile, have calmed down in the past several months, since Immelt adamantly denied that a auction was on the table.)

Watch full size video:

Besides the head and body switching, some necks were stretched, one maiden’s arm was missing, and another girl’s head was placed on what appeared to be a denuded body, with the chest blurred.

A spokeswoman for Minnesota-based Lifetouch National School Studios Inc. said the alterations were “every unfortunate shortcoming in judgment” by one employee but didn’t believe it was resentful.

The strong school had required Lifetouch to make heads the same size and eyes at the same level in all student photos, company spokeswoman Sara Thurin Rollin said Saturday. The ask for was “unusual and definitely very particular, but that’s not to suggest what happened in the present state is acceptable,” she said.

Rollin declined to say if the company fired or reprimanded the employee who altered the images. She uttered Lifetouch is taking full accountableness for the altered pictures, about 30 in totally, and will pay to be the subject of the publication reprinted before the seniors graduate.

Lori Oglesbee, the govern’s yearbook adviser at McKinney High School, declared the yearbook staff would spend the weekend rebuilding the yearbook.

McKinney is about 20 miles north of Dallas.

Data buckler officials have warned the search engine giant that its Street View service must comply through regulations to launch in Europe

by Leigh Phillips

Watch full volume video:

Global search weapon colossus Google has been warned by the EU data shelter chief that the “Street View” feature in continuance its Google Maps service could run up close up to European privacy laws on the supposition that it launches in EU countries.

Street View allows users of Google’s online map service to be seized of a full-colour, 360-degree take care on all sides city streets. Users be possible to digitally walk up and down the virtual street, that is built from composites of photographs taken by roaming Google cars with roof-mounted cameras.

Peter Hustinx, the EU facts protection supervisor, told reporters while presenting his annual data defence announcement on Thursday (15 May) that if Google launched such a feature in Europe, the company would rudimentary have to comply with European privacy legislation, which in many member states is stricter than in the United States.

“I would encourage Google to be seized of an opinion about how to do this,” Mr Hustinx said, AP reports. “Making pictures on the street is in frequent cases not a puzzle, but formation pictures everywhere is certainly going to create some problems. I’m quite sure they are aware of this.”

The service, already launched for divers US and Canadian cities, has wowed users, who report that Street View allows them to digitally cause to be a trip to cities they have always wanted to visit.

At the same time, concealment concerns have arisen, as people walking down a street are also captured through the photographs. They are not so worried in various places being photographed visiting the Empire State Building, but somewhat then photographed entering an X-rated cinema or urinating in public.

“Complying with European data protection law is going to be part of their business success or failure,” Mr Hustinx added. “If they would ignore it, it is likely to tend to [court] cases, and I think they would be hit hard.”

The guests has not launched the service in Europe yet, although it has announced plans to do so next year, and Google cars snapping away photos of the vias and rues of Rome and Paris have already been spotted.

The society responded to the EU official’s concerns by saying it is perfecting face-blurring technology.

“We’re taking this opportunity to test our new face-blurring technology in continuance the busy streets of Manhattan,” the visitors said in blog posting.

“This effort has been a year in the making—working at Street View-scale is a tough challenge that required us to advance state-of-the-art automatic face detection, and we prolong working unsympathetic to make use of it as we roll it out for our existing and future imagery.”

DNA databases lack safeguards

Separately, the data protection official warned in his circulate publicly that EU rules agreed through ministers last June which allow police to check DNA databases across all member states lack the suitable privacy safeguards.

“In some cases it will be a nightmare not only in opposition to citizens but also law sanction authorities… What might have been done responsibly has not been done well,” related Mr Hustinx, according to Irish state broadcaster RTE.

“Tourists could find themselves suspects in a cross-border criminal investigation merely for having had a drink at a motorway service station.”

Last year, EU member states agreed to allow their DNA databases to have being shared across the union within three years.

However, the safeguards also agreed at the time do not take into account variations in national legislation, and are over complex to operate effectively, said Mr Hustinx.

HARARE (Reuters) - Supporters of Zimbabwe's main opposition party gathered for a rally on Sunday after a court overturned a police prohibitory penalty, for all that presidential aspirant Morgan Tsvangirai won't be appearing because of assassination fears.

Watch full size video:

The Rev. Jack Graham, pastor of Prestonwood Baptist Church, said for the period of services Saturday that the church accepted Joe Barron’s resignation, effective immediately.

Barron was charged Friday with online solicitation of a minor. Undercover officers posing as a 13-year-old girl communicated with the 52-year-old minister for about two weeks. The online conversations were sexual in nature, police said.

On May 6, Barron suggested meeting the girl in part. He drove nearly 200 miles on Thursday to meet her in Bryan, to what he was arrested. Police said they ground a web-cam and condoms in the minister’s car.

Barron was released from the Brazos County Jail on Friday night put in succession $7,000 security. Police were unsure if he had one member of the bar.

Graham said it was a heartbreaking week in which “you need to know that we are appalled and we are disgraced by dint of. this severe proceeding, an unacceptable action, by a minister on our staff.”

The pastor said he was eager to move on.

“We want to put this in the rearview mirror,” Graham said. “We faculty of volition handle anything we necessity to handle in terms of our responsibilities and obligations, and any ongoing investigation.

Prestonwood Baptist Church is one of the largest churches in the home with 26,000 members and 40 ministers.

___

On the Net:

http://www.prestonwood.org

Watch full size video:

DEAR AT: I actually think your friend can finesse having read the diary. It is securely no secret in the family that the mother-daughter relationship is in the tank. Therefore, the mother can simply tell her daughter the life has come to improve the situation, that a jihad between them is not what she wants, and that a better kinship would be in both their interests. I disagree that a mother who is "doing her job" is going to be repaid with hatred. I know of various daughters who had mothers who set limits and boundaries, and they took it all in stride. I was one of them. Suggest to your friend that joint counseling main be of exercise to explain the position of each to the other.

— MARGO, HISTORICALLY

What To Do When People Invite Themselves

DEAR MARGO: My best friend of 15 years and I have planned a vacation for this summer. It is going to be the sum of two units of us, as well being of the kind which our boyfriends. We are positively looking forward to just the four of us hanging out every part of week in the sunny tropics! My question is that while talking to my cousin united day, I mentioned the trip and by what means excited I was to go, and she said to me, "I'm going to confabulation to my friend Dave and inquire if he'll make payment to for us to go, also." My cousin has always made it clear to me that she doesn't like my best confidant so I'm a scanty confused for the reason that to why she would so much as crave to accept on this trip. And because she just invited herself to couple us, I didn't really know what to recite. I owe a grudge to to be blunt, but I don't want her to go. We obtain along well but get self-same different personalities, and allowing that we weren't related, we probably would never choose to be friends. I also feel that it's not fair to my best friend and her boyfriend because this is their vacation, too, and I don't think they would be comfortable with my cousin and her friend coming. How be possible to I tell her I don't want her to go without hurting her feelings?

— STUMPED IN BALTIMORE

DEAR STUMP: I suspect the cousin may wind up with hurt feelings, but that's the price one pays for trying to invite oneself. As I have said sundry times previous to, I don't believe in being held hostage to insensitive people. Simply tell her all the plans have been made for four and it's been planned for a long time. And it's OK if you weighty a little cool to her idea. If this virgin is in truth a clod and pushes, say that the boyfriends would not be grateful through enlarging the group. Over and out.

— MARGO, IMPLACABLY

Dear Margo is written by Margo Howard, Ann Landers' daughter. All letters must be sent via e-mail to click in this place.

COPYRIGHT 2008 MARGO HOWARD DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.

Previous: Did You Ever See a Wart Walking?